Tr?id=566623520170033&ev=PageView&noscript=1

Wells Fargo Loses Bid for TRO Against Fired Illinois Broker

Posted on January 31st, 2025 at 10:16 AM
Wells Fargo Loses Bid for TRO Against Fired Illinois Broker

Originally published by AdvisorHub on January 30th, 2025. Authored by Karmen Alexander. 

A federal judge has denied Wells Fargo Advisor’s request for a temporary restraining order against a Schaumburg, Illinois-based broker it fired in November, according to a court filing on Wednesday.

Judge Matthew F. Kennelly issued the denial without a written explanation but did allow Wells to continue to seek evidence through expedited discovery and press its claims for a longer-term injunction, according to the court order. 

Wells last week sued Elias S. Friedman, who had spent 23 years of his 31-year career with Wells, for violating inherited account and teaming agreements by soliciting clients to join his new firm, Mariner Independent Advisors. The wirehouse asked for a TRO blocking him and a retired partner from encouraging clients to move assets and to return any customer contact information they were using for outreach. 

Friedman said in a response filed on Monday that Wells’ allegations were based on “triple hearsay” and didn’t meet the high bar for a TRO. 

Wells was “unable to provide sufficient evidence at this stage” that Friedman solicited clients that were governed by the succession and team agreements, James Eccleston of Eccleston Law in Chicago, who represents Friedman, said in an email. Eccleston also said that Kennelly indicated during hearings that Friedman’s announcement of his move to customers “was not a solicitation.”

A spokesperson for Wells declined to comment. 

The court’s permission for expedited discovery is unusual in TRO cases and suggests that the court recognizes the “importance to all parties of moving this quickly” and “almost a presumption” that Wells may prevail ultimately and secure the injunction after more evidence has been presented, according to Jacob Frenkel of Dickinson-Wright Law in Washington, D.C. said in an interview. 

Frenkel, who is not involved in the litigation, noted that inherited account and team agreements have “been enforced historically” and are “likely to be enforced here as well.”

Both Wells and Mariner have joined the Protocol for Broker Recruiting, an industry treaty that allows firms to solicit clients when moving among signatory firms. But the succession and team agreements override those protections, and Wells noted that Friedman’s entire book was governed by one of the two agreements. 

Wells had also filed a complaint with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority seeking a permanent injunction and damages, which will continue to proceed under a non-expedited schedule because it lost the TRO, according to an outside lawyer. 

Wells fired Friedman for “not meeting behavioral expectations involving interactions with a colleague,” according to his U5 termination notice filed with regulators. He joined Mariner on January 7, according to registration records. 

Wells additionally named Cynthia B. Jones, whose clients Friedman and a team member inherited following her retirement in 2021, as a defendant in its complaint. Wells claimed that she encouraged a client to join Friedman’s new firm. The judge’s order on Wednesday makes no mention of Jones, and she could not be reached for comment. 

Related Attorneys: James J. Eccleston

Tags: eccleston, eccleston law

Return to Archive

TESTIMONIALS

Previous
Next
Quotes Bigger

Hiring Eccleston Law has been one of the best career decisions I have made and this "investment" to maintain my sterling regulatory record has been returned many times over.  If you are in a situation where you've been unfairly accused, don't hesitate to talk with Eccleston Law. They are the best.

Thomas C.

LATEST NEWS AND ARTICLES

1785858278 Law
August 4, 2026
SEC Fines Former LPL Broker $125,000 for Undisclosed Conflicts in Private Securities Offerings

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has censured a former LPL Financial broker and imposed a $125,000 civil penalty after finding that he failed to disclose conflicts of interest related to private real estate securities offerings that generated nearly $1.5 million in compensation, as reported by AdvisorHub.

1785772777 Law
August 3, 2026
FINRA Launches Review of High-Risk Structured Notes Sales and Supervision

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has launched a regulatory sweep examining the sale of high-risk structured products, with particular attention on non-principal protected "worst-of" structured notes, according to AdvisorHub.

1785531573 Law
July 31, 2026
Former Alabama Financial Advisor Barred After Selling His Practice

The U.S.