RIAs Increasingly Rely on Non-Competes Borrowed From Broker-Dealers

Posted on December 22nd, 2022 at 12:15 PM
RIAs Increasingly Rely on Non-Competes Borrowed From Broker-Dealers

Registered investment advisory firms (RIAs) have borrowed a legal tactic from the broker-dealer space, as RIAs increasingly take defectors to court with allegations of non-compete clause violations, according to a recent article published by AdvisorHub

RIA non-compete disputes are different, however.  First, the disputes are not adjudicated at Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) Dispute Resolution, because neither party is associated with FINRA. Typically, the disputes start in court, and they will remain in court unless there is an arbitration clause, such as an American Arbitration Association (AAA) arbitration clause. 

Notwithstanding where they dispute is adjudicated, competent counsel must examine the contractual restrictions carefully, and then must test the enforceability of such restrictions against applicable state law.  There is no national jurisprudence, nor any one-size fits all approach. Finally, legal requirements and proofs vary in each state as to whether a plaintiff, in these cases a RIA firm, can obtain a TRO or injunctive relief.

Eccleston Law LLC represents investors and financial advisors nationwide in securities, employment, regulatory and disciplinary matters, including disputes nationwide in courts and in arbitration surrounding restrictive agreements.

Tags:

Return to Archive

TESTIMONIALS

Previous
Next

 


It was really fun seeing you fight for us. You have an amazing way of thinking out of the box.


 

Beth M.

LATEST NEWS AND ARTICLES

October 7, 2025
Tricolor Bankruptcy Sparks DOJ Probe and Distress in Subprime Auto Loan Market

Tricolor Holdings, a subprime auto lender that combined used-car sales with high-interest financing for borrowers with limited or no credit history, has collapsed into bankruptcy amid a federal investigation into alleged fraud.

October 6, 2025
Judge Allows Widow's $8 Million FINRA Arbitration Claim Against JPMorgan to Proceed

JPMorgan Chase & Co. failed in its effort to block an 85-year-old widow from pursuing claims in FINRA arbitration over allegations that the bank failed to prevent her son from siphoning more than $8 million from her accounts.

October 3, 2025
SEC Charges Pennsylvania Man in $400 Million Ponzi Scheme

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has charged Daryl F. Heller of Pennsylvania, along with his companies Prestige Investment Group, LLC, and Paramount Management Group, LLC, for operating a Ponzi scheme that caused investor losses of roughly $400 million.