Examining Firm Liability for Third-Party and Client Misdeeds

Posted on June 24th, 2024 at 12:01 PM
Examining Firm Liability for Third-Party and Client Misdeeds

From the desk of Jim Eccleston at Eccleston Law 

FinancialPlanning.com recently asked, “How much liability can a firm have for the actions of third-party vendors or clients?” This question has surfaced in various legal contexts, most recently in a lawsuit against Wells Fargo, which faces allegations of failing to detect a $300 million Ponzi scheme perpetrated by a client.

FINRA arbitration panels previously held Bank of New York Mellon's Pershing subsidiary accountable for a notorious Ponzi scheme, demonstrating that firms can be liable for client actions. On the vendor side, regulators consistently remind firms that their liability extends beyond their operations. FinancialPlanning.com also reports that the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has proposed a rule that would require wealth managers to ensure their third-party vendors comply with fiduciary standards.

The evolving regulatory landscape underscores that liability does not end at a firm's threshold. Firms must remain vigilant and proactive in monitoring their clients and third-party vendors to mitigate potential risks and uphold industry standards.

 

Eccleston Law LLC represents investors and financial advisors nationwide in securities, employment, transition, regulatory, and disciplinary matters.

Tags: eccleston, eccleston law

Return to Archive

TESTIMONIALS

Previous
Next

If you are being bothered by the Regulators, call Eccleston Law, you won't regret it.

Rick R.

LATEST NEWS AND ARTICLES

February 3, 2026
FINRA Accuses Spartan Capital of Widespread Churning That Allegedly Harmed Customers

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has brought a disciplinary complaint against Spartan Capital Securities and several senior leaders of the New York City–based broker-dealer, alleging that the firm facilitated excessive trading that generated millions of dollars in revenue while causing substantial losses to customers.

February 2, 2026
California Investors Allege Unsuitable DST Recommendations in FINRA Arbitration

Two investors from the San Francisco Bay Area have filed a FINRA arbitration claim against brokerage firm Realized Financial and its financial advisors.

January 30, 2026
FINRA Arbitration Panel Orders J.P. Morgan to Amend Form U-5, Flags Potential Pattern of Conduct

A Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) arbitration panel recently issued an unusually detailed decision in a dispute between J.P. Morgan Securities and former advisor Joshua David Sappi Biering, shedding rare light on how a firm may deploy - and sometimes abuse - the Form U-5 during advisor departures.