Tr?id=566623520170033&ev=PageView&noscript=1

Jury Finds Investment Advisor Liable for Failing to Disclose Annuity Commissions

Posted on May 7th, 2025 at 3:31 PM
Jury Finds Investment Advisor Liable for Failing to Disclose Annuity Commissions

From the desk of Jim Eccleston at Eccleston Law

A federal jury in Massachusetts has found investment adviser Jeffrey Cutter and his firm, Cutter Financial Group, liable for violating federal securities law by failing to disclose significant upfront commissions and conflicts of interest related to an annuity replacement scheme.

According to ThinkAdvisor, the verdict followed a seven-day trial and five hours of jury deliberation. The jury concluded that Cutter and his firm violated Section 206(2) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, which prohibits practices that operate as fraud or deceit upon clients or prospective clients.

The SEC alleged that between 2018 and 2022, Cutter recommended that advisory clients purchase fixed indexed annuities that generated substantial upfront commissions for himself and his firm. The agency claimed that Cutter and his firm failed to adequately disclose these financial incentives, resulting in $640,000 in surrender charges for clients involved in the annuity transactions.

While the jury ruled in the SEC’s favor on the Section 206(2) claim, it rejected the Commission’s allegations under Sections 206(1) and 206(4).

ThinkAdvisor also reports that Cutter had previously moved to dismiss the case, arguing that he acted as a state-licensed insurance agent, not as an investment adviser, in connection with the annuity sales. Industry groups, including the National Association for Fixed Annuities and the Investor Choice Advocates Network, filed amicus briefs in support of Cutter’s position, asserting that fixed indexed annuities fall outside the SEC’s jurisdiction.

Despite those arguments, the jury determined that Cutter’s conduct as an investment adviser triggered obligations under the Investment Advisers Act, and his failure to disclose material conflicts of interest violated federal securities law.

 

Eccleston Law LLC represents investors and financial advisors nationwide in securities, employment, transition, regulatory, and disciplinary matters.

Tags: eccleston, eccleston law

Return to Archive

TESTIMONIALS

Previous
Next
Quotes Bigger

If the regulators are after you, and are trying to make a case against you, and you are going to contest their allegations against you, make sure you have the best securities industry defense lawyers, Eccleston Law Firm. My case was spun into a combination of penalties including fines, cash settlements, CE courses and suspension. They were the best I have seen in action. When all was said and done, they had done their magic, my situation was negotiated and settled with a simple "letter of caution" and a case closed without action. It is the most important legal business decision you will ever make, make it Eccleston Law.

Rick R.

LATEST NEWS AND ARTICLES

1785344491 Law
July 29, 2026
Edward Jones Invests in Fintech Firm Focused on Preventing Elder Financial Fraud

Edward D.

1785249991 Law
July 28, 2026
Merrill Lynch Fined by FINRA for Failing to Report More Than 1,600 Customer Complaints

Merrill Lynch has agreed to pay a $225,000 fine and accept a censure to resolve allegations that it failed to properly identify and report more than 1,600 customer complaints submitted through post-call surveys, according to a Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) Acceptance, Waiver and Consent letter ("AWC").

1784905692 Law
July 24, 2026
Independent Review Recommends Sweeping Changes to FINRA's Enforcement Program

An independent review commissioned by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) recommends significant changes to the regulator's enforcement program, including adopting a statute of limitations, expanding due process protections, and providing greater credit to firms that cooperate during investigations, according to AdvisorHub.