Just Saying “No” to Firm-Provided and Conflicted Legal Counsel in Your Transition may avoid problems later

Posted on April 14th, 2021 at 3:55 PM
Just Saying “No” to Firm-Provided and Conflicted Legal Counsel in Your Transition may avoid problems later

Our recently filed court case of Armstrong and Kiefner vs. Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, and Michael Taaffe alleges behavior that financial advisors should be aware of in considering whether or not they should have agreed to be represented by legal counsel selected/referred by their new firm in connection with their employment transition. 

Counsel for the advisor must diligently and competently plan the transition, understand the law and the relevant employment agreements, negotiate the new employment agreement with the new firm (or refer the matter to another lawyer to do so), prepare a court defense and represent the advisor to the best of the lawyer’s ability, independently, without conflicts of interests, through the conclusion of any litigation.

Regrettably, a nasty underbelly associated with firm-provided legal counsel is alleged in the Shumaker lawsuit:

  • Counsel May Not Be Independent, May Not Disclose Its Conflicts of Interest, and May Not Obtain the Requisite Informed Consent from the Advisor- Until It’s Too Late
  • Counsel May Not Study or Provide Needed Advice to the Applicable Employment Agreements, State Law, Regulations, Any New Employer Policies and Any Prior Litigation/Arbitration Between Old and New Firms
  • Counsel May Forget That They Owe Stringent Ethical Duties (such as the duty not to reveal client confidences) to Their Individual Advisor Clients, and Owe NO Duties to The Firm Paying Their Legal Bill
  • Counsel May Throw the Advisor Client “Under the Bus” to Maintain the Firm’s Sterling Relationship with the Firm, No Matter How Damaging to Their Client Advisor

Successful advisors and their teams just can’t take the chance that they will be poorly served; the stakes are too high.

Tags: eccleston, eccleston law, recent case

Return to Archive

TESTIMONIALS

Previous
Next

I learned two important things working with Eccleston Law. First, I made a friend and ally with Jim and Steph for life. Secondly, and this is a crucial life lesson - if you need counsel, then seek out the very best. Jim was referred to me by a most trusted source. I've never had to hire an attorney for anything. Now, I know the value of hiring an important partner. Meticulous, thorough and detailed in preparation is the best way to describe Jim. Brilliant too, I might add. Bottom line, I would highly highly recommend Jim and Stephany for your legal needs. One of the best life decisions I've ever made.

Howard S.

LATEST NEWS AND ARTICLES

May 19, 2022
UBS Advisor Joins U.S. Capital After Contentious Compliance Review

A UBS Wealth Management advisor who generated $3 million in annual revenue has joined U.S. Capital Wealth Advisors, which is a regional Texas-based firm run by a former UBS manager.

 
 
May 18, 2022
Some Advisors Chose Inopportune Time To Boost Bet On GWG Bonds

Financial advisors who chose to double down on GWG are having second thoughts.

 
 
May 17, 2022
Focus Financial Board Member Sues J.P. Morgan Over $7 Million In Pandemic Losses

A California dermatologist, who also is a Focus Financial Partners board member, has filed a $7 million arbitration claim against J.P. Morgan over pandemic-related losses in a managed account.