In battle over bonuses, why so many advisers lose it all in arbitration

Posted on April 12th, 2017 at 3:02 PM
In battle over bonuses, why so many advisers lose it all in arbitration

Jim Eccleston was recently mentioned an article published by Andrew Welsch on OnWallStreet.com.

The article pertained to legal battles between firms and advisors when advisors leave a firm or switch from one firm to another.

Jim was quoted in the article multiple times stating:

It's "the equivalent of Michael Jordan having a one-on-one with a third grader," says James Eccleston, a Chicago-based securities attorney of 30 years.

When discussing situations when advisors choose to skip hiring a lawyer and choose to represent themselves instead.

Jim also stated: 

"Most [promissory note] agreements will contain a clause to repay the firm that portion of the unpaid promissory note balance upon any kind of termination, whether that termination is for cause or not for cause or even wrongful," Eccleston says.

Eccleston and other attorneys say that the language is often ironclad, and the firms view these contracts as clear-cut. 

Read More >>

Related Attorneys: James J. Eccleston

Tags: Eccleston, Eccleston Law, James Eccleston, Eccleston Law LLC

Return to Archive

TESTIMONIALS

Previous
Next

If you find yourself in trouble with the regulators, call Eccleston Law, you won't regret it.

Rick R.

LATEST NEWS AND ARTICLES

August 16, 2022
SEC Warns Financial Advisory Firms Regarding Conflicts of Interest Tied to Compensation

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has sent a warning to financial advisory firms that they must go above and beyond solely disclosing conflicts of interest related to employee pay programs in order to avoid regulatory scrutiny. 

August 15, 2022
FINRA Proposal Would Permit Private Homes to Serve as Non-Branch Offices

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has filed proposed changes to FINRA Rule 3110 with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

August 12, 2022
SEC Charges J.P. Morgan, UBS, and TradeStation for Deficiencies Pertaining to the Prevention of Customer Identify Theft

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has charged J.P. Morgan Securities, UBS Financial Services, and TradeStation Securities over deficiencies in their programs designed to prevent client identify theft, which violates the SEC’s Identity Theft Red Flags Rule, or Regulation S-ID.