GPB Capital Holdings: Special Alert for Your Clients Who Invested

Posted on October 3rd, 2020 at 9:58 AM
GPB Capital Holdings: Special Alert for Your Clients Who Invested

GPB Capital Holdings, LLC (“GPB Capital”) has come under intense scrutiny and regulatory accusations that it perpetrated a $1.8 billion Ponzi scheme in selling numerous GPB “Funds”.

What Happened?

Sold as a vehicle that guaranteed substantial monthly income distributions, not from return of capital but instead from operating profits, approximately 2,000 investors bought GPB Funds (including GPB Automotive Portfolio LP and GPB Holdings II).

However, beginning in 2018, GPB Capital began to unravel with its April, 2018 failure to produce audited financial statements, its August, 2018 warning to investors not to rely on 2015 and 2016 financial statements, and the November, 2018 resignation of its auditor.

The situation worsened in 2019 with a February, 2019 FBI raid on GPB’s New York offices, and the October, 2019 indictment of GPB’s compliance officer.

Most recently, last May the Massachusetts Securities Enforcement Section filed a detailed Administrative Complaint alleging:

The firm continued to make its monthly distributions in order to maintain appearances and stay attractive to investors. In order to keep up with distributions, GPB Capital began dipping into other sources of incomes …eventually turn[ing] to investor contributions to meet the demands of the 8% monthly distributions, and the fund financials tell as much.

The complaint alleges that, in connection with the offerings to investors, GPB Capital made false and misleading statements and omitted material facts in connection with the offer and sale of GPB Funds.

What Recourse Is Available to Your Clients?

Currently, only one regulator (Massachusetts) has filed a complaint seeking rescission of the investment for Massachusetts investors. No other states, FINRA or the SEC has brought an action.

To fill that void, class actions and arbitration actions are being solicited and have been filed.

Nonetheless, investors must weigh their options carefully. A class action likely will not be a prudent approach. And many attorneys who solicit investors to file arbitration claims may not have sufficient qualifications, experience, support, legal staff and financial resources to adequately represent your clients in FINRA arbitration.

Accordingly, and given the dire and extreme circumstances involved in what appears to be a Ponzi scheme, Eccleston Law LLC is accepting your referrals to help your investor clients recover their losses. Please contact us (or have your clients contact us) for a no-charge, initial consultation.

Tags:

Return to Archive

TESTIMONIALS

Previous
Next

I learned two important things working with Eccleston Law. First, I made a friend and ally with Jim and Steph for life. Secondly, and this is a crucial life lesson - if you need counsel, then seek out the very best. Jim was referred to me by a most trusted source. I've never had to hire an attorney for anything. Now, I know the value of hiring an important partner. Meticulous, thorough and detailed in preparation is the best way to describe Jim. Brilliant too, I might add. Bottom line, I would highly highly recommend Jim and Stephany for your legal needs. One of the best life decisions I've ever made.

Howard S.

LATEST NEWS AND ARTICLES

July 26, 2024
Kentucky Advisor Sues LPL Financial for Alleged Corporate Raid

A Kentucky advisor, Mark Lamkin, has filed a lawsuit against LPL Financial, claiming the independent broker-dealer orchestrated a corporate raid that resulted in the loss of his firm’s entire book of managed assets.

July 25, 2024
FINRA Plans Fee Increases Amid Rising Costs and Losses

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has announced plans to raise fees for its approximately 3,300 broker-dealer member firms. According to AdvisorHub, the self-regulator faces soaring costs, as detailed in its annual report published at the end of June.

July 24, 2024
Raymond James Settles with Oregon Over Excessive Commissions

Raymond James recently settled a case with Oregon's Division of Financial Regulation (“DFR”), agreeing to pay nearly $200,000 over allegations of charging excessive commissions to retail investors.