Finra arbitration panel awards $500,000 to former Morgan Stanley rep

Posted on May 12th, 2015 at 11:25 AM
Finra arbitration panel awards $500,000 to former Morgan Stanley rep

A Finra arbitration panel last Thursday decided in favor of a former Morgan Stanley rep following a dispute between the broker and firm over an alleged breach of a promissory note.

In a disagreement dating back to December 2012, Morgan Stanley asserted that the former rep, John Offenburger, breached a promissory note that would be payable to the firm in full once the rep was no longer employed there, according to the award letter.

The wirehouse alleged that Mr. Offenburger's employment at Morgan Stanley was terminated on Oct. 5, 2012, and that he refused to pay the balance due, according to the award letter. Morgan Stanley sought $519,131.98 in payment, along with damages, interest, costs and attorneys' fees.

In response, Mr. Offenburger filed a counterclaim in April 2013 denying the firm's claims and leveling a slate of accusations against Morgan Stanley, including breach of contract, fraudulent or negligent presentations, defamation and tortious interference with business relations, per the award letter. The former rep claimed that he was forced to resign and that Morgan Stanley's agents made “false and defamatory statements” about him to his clients.

Mr. Offenburger also sought $1.395 million in damages.

The arbitration panel denied all of Morgan Stanley's claims, stating “that the promissory note was unenforceable and no fraud was proven,” according to the award letter.

Meanwhile, the arbitration panel awarded Mr. Offenburger $500,000 for his claim of lost income.

The panel decided that Morgan Stanley's promissory note to the former rep satisfies the award, meaning that the sum due to Mr. Offenburger has been paid in full, according to the award letter.

Calls to Mr. Offenburger's attorney James J. Eccleston were not immediately returned. Morgan Stanley spokeswoman Christine Jockle declined to comment.


This article was originally posted on on May 11th, 2015.

Related Attorneys: James J. Eccleston

Tags: James Eccleston, Jim Eccleston, Eccleston Law Offices, Morgan Stanley, Broker Protocol,

Return to Archive



If you are being bothered by the Regulators, call Eccleston Law, you won't regret it.

Rick R.


August 16, 2022
SEC Warns Financial Advisory Firms Regarding Conflicts of Interest Tied to Compensation

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has sent a warning to financial advisory firms that they must go above and beyond solely disclosing conflicts of interest related to employee pay programs in order to avoid regulatory scrutiny. 

August 15, 2022
FINRA Proposal Would Permit Private Homes to Serve as Non-Branch Offices

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has filed proposed changes to FINRA Rule 3110 with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

August 12, 2022
SEC Charges J.P. Morgan, UBS, and TradeStation for Deficiencies Pertaining to the Prevention of Customer Identify Theft

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has charged J.P. Morgan Securities, UBS Financial Services, and TradeStation Securities over deficiencies in their programs designed to prevent client identify theft, which violates the SEC’s Identity Theft Red Flags Rule, or Regulation S-ID.