Are Robo-Advisor Programmers Fiduciaries?

Posted on November 18th, 2015 at 1:57 PM
Are Robo-Advisor Programmers Fiduciaries?

This article was originally published on November 16, 2015 on Financial Advisor by Ted Knutson.

With robo-advisors gaining steam, should the computer programming wizards behind them be held to a fiduciary standard?

Talk to experts and you get a firm, “sometimes.”

One professional in the “yes” camp is Andrew Stoltmann, a Chicago-based securities and investment fraud attorney who sits on the board of the Public Investors Arbitration Bar Association.

“If a firm outsources recommendations to a robot, it better make certain that robot is properly programmed to exclusively recommend a diversified asset allocated portfolio,” said Stoltmann.

He said—half in jest—that an army of well-trained, ethical robots could put him out of business because most of the cases he brings against advisors charge they have instituted non-diversified, non-asset-allocated buckets of investments for their clients.

Another Windy City securities law attorney, James Eccleston, who represents both investors and advisors, said if a roboadvisor is giving recommendations, a computer programmer should be held to same the standard as a broker if the techie is acting in concert with compliance and legal personnel.

“Ordinarily, a programmer is one small cog in wheel,” he said.

But that caveat goes away for Eccelston if the programmer is literally a one-person robo operation.

Financial planning blogger and Western Kentucky University finance professor Ron Rhodes noted programmers don’t have the relationship of trust and confidence that flesh-and-blood advisors do, yet they have been sued for aiding and abetting fraud.

Michael Chadwick, an advisor in Hartford, Conn., argued robo-advisors shouldn’t escape the ethical obligations he works under.

“I worry about this stuff. If they are producing a product that the public is going to try to use to improve their financial outcomes, they should be held to the same standards we are,” said Chadwick.

Andy Cullison, director of the Prindle Institute for Ethics at DePauw University in Greenscastle, Ind., said he is seeing the debate over ethical standards for programmers all across the technology industry where computer programs are taking on decision-making roles.

“It's not unique to the finance industry,” Cullison said.

 

Related Attorneys: James J. Eccleston

Tags: Eccleston, Eccleston Law, Eccleston Law LLC, James Eccleston,

Return to Archive

TESTIMONIALS

Previous
Next

You were most helpful with my FINRA deposition. You are a good lawyer and a good person.

Dan B.

LATEST NEWS AND ARTICLES

February 22, 2024
Key Considerations for Advisors When Assessing the Financial Soundness of Annuities

While rating agencies like Fitch and S&P Global Ratings generally highlight the strength of annuity issuers, advisors still should scrutinize certain factors in their assessment process.

February 21, 2024
SEC Alleges Fraud Against Morgan Stanley and Former Executive in Block Trading Business

As reported by the Wall Street Journal, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has charged Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC and its former head of equity syndicate desk, Pawan Passi, with a multi-year fraud involving the disclosure of confidential information related to block trades.

February 20, 2024
Challenges Persist: Firms Struggle to Comply with Regulation Best Interest

FINRA's annual report for 2024 reveals a concerning trend among broker-dealers, with numerous instances of violations of Regulation Best Interest (Reg BI).