When Custodians Defame Investment Advisers to Their Clients In Terminating Investment Manager Service Agreements

Posted on June 7th, 2022 at 3:03 PM
When Custodians Defame Investment Advisers to Their Clients In Terminating Investment Manager Service Agreements

From the Desk of Jim Eccleston at Eccleston Law:

No doubt, custodians can do business with whomever investment advisers they want.  Custodians can terminate their investment manager service agreements for any reason or for no reason at all, just like investment advisers can change custodians for any reason or for no reason at all.

Of course, the custodian must notify clients when the custodian terminates an investment manager service agreement, providing guidance as to next steps and as to what clients may expect through the termination process.

So, the question arises: how should a custodian communicate such a termination to clients of the investment adviser?  How much detail can and should be provided?

Recently, we were more than dismayed to consult an investment adviser whose custodian notified his clients in writing that the custodian was terminating his investment manager service agreement.  The custodian provided a helpful FAQ -- that was good.  However, the custodian also provided a statement of “concerns” to each and every client of the investment adviser – that was very bad.  The “concerns” went to the heart of the investment adviser’s reputation, standing in the professional community, and breach of fiduciary duty.  The “concerns” implied an egregious sales practice violation normally sanctioned by way of an industry bar.

Put another way, investment advisers should be aware that their custodians have no legal privilege to defame them to their clients. In other words, the defamatory notification of the custodian’s “concerns” finds no “safe haven” as a regulatory filing.  Fuel to the fire is added when the custodian makes a sales pitch to clients that they can choose to continue to maintain their advisory accounts at the custodian.

Investment advisers who have suffered at the hands of their custodians with such defamatory notifications should contact Eccleston Law, LLC to discuss their legal options.

 
 
 
 

Tags:

Return to Archive

TESTIMONIALS

Previous
Next

Jim, Stephany and the whole team were a God send.  We felt like we were put into a situation where we had no advocate. Jim’s team came in with a strong, well laid out strategy on how to get our story heard. Where our outside compliance company had no ability to help, our Broker Dealer was impenitent, and the regulators were aggressive pursuing vague rules, Jim came like a barricade against an assault we did not understand. Though you pay member dues to be affiliated with FINRA and a B/D, you have no voice. The only thing that is truly heard in this un-level playing field is a bulldog’s bark like Jim’s. I would encourage anyone to call Jim and his team to find a real ally in the tough and complicated world of securities regulation. They are truly the best.

Greg P.

LATEST NEWS AND ARTICLES

September 12, 2025
LPL Broker Fined and Suspended for Recommending Risky Investments to Elderly Client

An LPL Financial broker in Elizabethtown, Kentucky, has agreed to sanctions after FINRA found he violated Regulation Best Interest (Reg BI) when recommending unsuitable investments to an elderly customer.

 

September 11, 2025
Montana Federal Judge Allows Family's Premium Financing Claims to Proceed

A federal judge in Montana has allowed a family to move forward with negligence, fraud, and unjust enrichment claims tied to a premium-financed life insurance arrangement valued at $67.5 million.

September 10, 2025
Arizona Man Sentenced to 30 Years for Multi-Million Dollar Ponzi-Style Fraud

An Arizona man has been sentenced to 30 years in prison for running a Ponzi-style investment scheme that defrauded more than 100 victims out of millions of dollars, according to the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of New Mexico.