What You Need to Know About the New SEC and Dodd Frank Whistleblower Protection-Part 4

Posted on November 28th, 2017 at 1:16 PM
What You Need to Know About the New SEC and Dodd Frank Whistleblower Protection-Part 4

From the Desk of Jim Eccleston at Eccleston Law LLC:

This is the fourth in a series of posts discussing whistleblower protection. This post will cover whether it is “reasonable” for employees to secretly take company documents for the purpose of using as evidence in retaliation claims.

Employees always risk exposure for breach of contract, misappropriation, sanction, or worse, if they have signed agreements preventing the public dissemination of company documents. (See, e.g., Order, United States ex rel. Ferris v. Afognak Native Corp., No. 3:15-cv-0150-HRH, ECF No. 328 (D. Alaska Oct. 18, 2017). However, many courts have found that taking or copying documents to prove retaliation claims are protected activities if the actions were found to be “reasonable”. (See Niswander v. Cincinnati Ins. Co., 529 F. 3d 714 (6th Cir. 2008).

Courts have looked at many factors regarding the “reasonableness” of the action, such as: “(1) how the documents were obtained, (2) to whom the documents were produced, (3) the content of the documents, both in terms of the need to keep the information confidential and its relevance to the employee’s claim of unlawful conduct, (4) why the documents were produced, including whether the production was in direct response to a discovery request, (5) the scope of the employer’s privacy policy, and (6) the ability of the employee to preserve the evidence in a manner that does not violate the employer’s privacy policy.” (See Niswander, 529 F.3d at 726).

Nevertheless, it is still important for whistleblowers to seek legal counsel and allow an attorney to determine what is “reasonable” in every specific situation.

 The attorneys of Eccleston Law LLC represent investors and advisors nationwide in securities and employment matters. The securities lawyers at Eccleston Law also practice a variety of other areas of practice for financial advisors including Broker Litigation & ArbitrationStrategic Consulting ServicesRegulatory  MattersTransition Contract Review, and much more. Our attorneys draw on a combined experience of nearly 65 years in delivering the highest quality legal services. If you are in need of legal services, contact us to schedule a one-on-one consultation today.

Related Attorneys: James J. Eccleston

Tags: Eccleston Law, Eccleston, James Eccleston, Eccleston Law LLC

Return to Archive

TESTIMONIALS

Previous
Next

Hiring Eccleston Law has been one of the best career decisions I have made and this "investment" to maintain my sterling regulatory record has been returned many times over.  If you are in a situation where you've been unfairly accused, don't hesitate to talk with Eccleston Law. They are the best.

Thomas C.

LATEST NEWS AND ARTICLES

October 11, 2024
Macquarie Investment Management to Pay $79.8 Million for Overvalued CMOs and Unlawful Cross Trades

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has charged Macquarie Investment Management Business Trust (MIMBT) with overvaluing collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs) and executing unlawful cross-trades that favored certain clients. 

October 10, 2024
Merrill Lynch and Harvest Volatility Management Fined $9.3 Million for Exceeding Client Investment Limits

According to SEC.gov, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has charged Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc., and Harvest Volatility Management LLC for exceeding clients’ designated investment limits, resulting in higher fees, increased market exposure, and financial losses. 

October 9, 2024
Charles Schwab Faces Lawsuit Over Failure to Prevent Elder Fraud in Computer Hack

A new lawsuit claims that Charles Schwab failed to protect an elderly client from a fraudulent scheme that drained her retirement savings.