What You Need to Know About the New SEC and Dodd Frank Whistleblower Protection-Part 3

Posted on November 22nd, 2017 at 9:58 AM
What You Need to Know About the New SEC and Dodd Frank Whistleblower Protection-Part 3

From the Desk of Jim Eccleston at Eccleston Law LLC:

This is the third in a series of posts discussing whistleblower protection. This post will cover the issue of whether a company can enforce a confidentiality agreement executed by an employee even after that employee has filed a whistleblower claim under Dodd-Frank.

SEC Rule, 17 C.F.R. § 240.217(a) prohibits employers from doing anything to impede an individual from whistleblowing to the SEC. However, many employers require that their employees sign boilerplate confidentiality agreements with strict requirements before they can join the company. Those companies likely will take legal action if an employee violates its confidentiality agreement. Other companies require their employees to sign confidentiality provisions that limit the ability to file a successful whistblower claim, either by requiring the employee to report to the company before filing anything with the SEC, or by requiring the employee to sign a waiver restraining his or her ability to collect any SEC award.

However, the SEC recently has taken action against several companies that imposed fines against their employees for filing whistleblower claims, as described in SEC Press Release No. 2017-14, “BlackRock Charged with Removing Whistleblower Incentives in Separation Agreements” (Jan. 17, 2017), as well as SEC Press Release No. 2017-24, “Financial Company Charged With Improper Accounting and Impeding Whistleblowers” (Jan. 19, 2017).

Nevertheless, it is still important for whistleblowers to seek legal counsel. Even though a confidentiality agreement violates certain SEC Rules, the contract is not invalidated and an employee still may be sued for breach of contract. (See JDS Uniphase Corp. v. Jennings, 473 F. Supp. 2d 697 (E.D. Va. 2007).

The attorneys of Eccleston Law LLC represent investors and advisors nationwide in securities and employment matters. The securities lawyers at Eccleston Law also practice a variety of other areas of practice for financial advisors including Broker Litigation & ArbitrationStrategic Consulting ServicesRegulatory  MattersTransition Contract Review, and much more. Our attorneys draw on a combined experience of nearly 65 years in delivering the highest quality legal services. If you are in need of legal services, contact us to schedule a one-on-one consultation today.

Related Attorneys: James J. Eccleston

Tags: Eccleston Law, Eccleston, James Eccleston, Eccleston Law LLC

Return to Archive

TESTIMONIALS

Previous
Next

If the regulators are after you, and are trying to make a case against you, and you are going to contest their allegations against you, make sure you have the best securities industry defense lawyers, Eccleston Law Firm. My case was spun into a combination of penalties including fines, cash settlements, CE courses and suspension. They were the best I have seen in action. When all was said and done, they had done their magic, my situation was negotiated and settled with a simple "letter of caution" and a case closed without action. It is the most important legal business decision you will ever make, make it Eccleston Law.

Rick R.

LATEST NEWS AND ARTICLES

July 26, 2024
Kentucky Advisor Sues LPL Financial for Alleged Corporate Raid

A Kentucky advisor, Mark Lamkin, has filed a lawsuit against LPL Financial, claiming the independent broker-dealer orchestrated a corporate raid that resulted in the loss of his firm’s entire book of managed assets.

July 25, 2024
FINRA Plans Fee Increases Amid Rising Costs and Losses

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has announced plans to raise fees for its approximately 3,300 broker-dealer member firms. According to AdvisorHub, the self-regulator faces soaring costs, as detailed in its annual report published at the end of June.

July 24, 2024
Raymond James Settles with Oregon Over Excessive Commissions

Raymond James recently settled a case with Oregon's Division of Financial Regulation (“DFR”), agreeing to pay nearly $200,000 over allegations of charging excessive commissions to retail investors.