What You Need to Know About the New SEC and Dodd Frank Whistleblower Protection-Part 2

Posted on November 21st, 2017 at 5:11 PM
What You Need to Know About the New SEC and Dodd Frank Whistleblower Protection-Part 2

From the Desk of Jim Eccleston at Eccleston Law LLC:

This is the second in a series of posts discussing whistleblower protection. This post will cover an ongoing Dodd-Frank Federal circuit split regarding the issue of whether an SEC whistleblower claim can be triggered by an employee making an internal report to his or her own company without also reporting the claim to the SEC.

Unlike Dodd-Frank, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act protects employees who report externally to a Federal regulatory or law enforcement agency as well as internally to a person with supervisory authority over the employee. (18 U.S.C. § 1514A (a) (1))

However, some Federal circuits have interpreted Dodd-Frank more narrowly with regard to its reporting requirement compared to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. More specifically, certain circuits have ruled that Dodd-Frank narrowly defines a whistleblower as an employee who reports suspected malfeasance only to the SEC (15 U.S.C. § 78u-6(a) (6)). For instance, the 5th Circuit has ruled that SEC reporting is required to file a proper Dodd-Frank whistleblower claim, whereas the 2nd Circuit and 9th Circuit have ruled that internal reporting is sufficient to trigger a claim.

The pending Supreme Court case addressed in our previous post (Digital Realty Tr. Inc. v. Somers, 137 S. Ct. 2300 (June 26, 2017) (No. 16-1276)) likely will be an important decision because the Court will finally put an end to this circuit split. The Court has stated that in its decision it will determine whether internal reporting alone triggers Dodd-Frank protection.

The attorneys of Eccleston Law LLC represent investors and advisors nationwide in securities and employment matters. The securities lawyers at Eccleston Law also practice a variety of other areas of practice for financial advisors including Broker Litigation & ArbitrationStrategic Consulting ServicesRegulatory  MattersTransition Contract Review, and much more. Our attorneys draw on a combined experience of nearly 65 years in delivering the highest quality legal services. If you are in need of legal services, contact us to schedule a one-on-one consultation today.

Related Attorneys: James J. Eccleston

Tags: Eccleston Law, Eccleston, James Eccleston, Eccleston Law LLC

Return to Archive



I just wanted to say thanks again for preparing and executing my case in such a professional manner. It was a pleasure to watch two professionals take such pride in their work, as well as becoming personally in tune with your client (Me). I would personally recommend you and your firm to anyone.

John O.


January 21, 2022
CFP Board Establishes New Appeals Commission

The Certified Financial Planner (CFP) Board of Standards has established a new Appeals Commission. As the name suggests, the Appeals Commission possesses the sole authority to adjudicate appeal hearings.

January 20, 2022
Edward Jones Fails To Convince Supreme Court To Review Federal Preemption of Account Fee Suit

Edward Jones & Co. failed to convince the U.S. Supreme Court to analyze how a federal securities law impacts a client dispute pertaining to fee-based accounts.

January 19, 2022
SEC Charges Texas Entities Over Oil and Gas Fraud

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has charged The Heartland Group Ventures, Heartland Production and Recovery, six other Heartland-affiliated entities, four Heartland-affiliated individuals as well as several oil and gas operators.