Wells Fargo and Former Advisor Ordered to Pay Customers In Churning Dispute

Posted on August 22nd, 2022 at 1:39 PM
Wells Fargo and Former Advisor Ordered to Pay Customers In Churning Dispute

From the Desk of Jim Eccleston at Eccleston Law.

A Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) arbitration panel has ordered Wells Fargo and a former advisor to pay a Pennsylvania couple at least $731,000 over a churning dispute that last nearly five years.

The couple initially filed their claim with FINRA in October 2017 alleging that their Wells Fargo advisor repeatedly violated their fiduciary duty by churning accounts, completing unauthorized trades, and recommending unsuitable investments. According to FINRA, the advisors additionally failed to minimize expenses and tax liability. The former Wells Fargo advisor, Gregory Pease, departed the firm in January 2017 and has not been registered as an investment advisor since May 2021.

According to the arbitration claim, Pease “unilaterally altered risk profiles on Claimants’ account application forms, routinely churned Claimants’ investments through various investment vehicles, and placed Claimants in many investments and portfolios that exceeded Claimants’ stated risk tolerance.” The couple, Edward and Wendy Pesicka, alleged that the investments were “made with the sole purpose of generating additional commission or fees in Pease’s favor.” While the couple prevailed in arbitration, the award fell substantially short of the $9.4 million in damages the couple was initially seeking.

Eccleston Law LLC represents investors and financial advisors nationwide in securities, employment, regulatory and disciplinary matters.

Tags: eccleston, eccleston law, advisors, law

Return to Archive

TESTIMONIALS

Previous
Next

This was the best of all possible outcomes and I cannot thank you and the team enough.

Michael S.

LATEST NEWS AND ARTICLES

June 23, 2025
FINRA Fines AAG Capital for RILA Exchange Violations

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) has fined AAG Capital $100,000 and ordered the firm to pay nearly $39,000 in restitution after finding it violated Regulation Best Interest (“Reg BI”) by recommending costly registered index-linked annuities (“RILAs") to retail clients in unsuitable product excha...

June 19, 2025
SEC Charges Former Real Estate CEO in $46 Million Investment Fraud Scheme

The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) has charged Kenneth Mattson, former CEO of LeFever Mattson, with orchestrating a $46 million investment fraud scheme that targeted approximately 200 investors, many of them retired senior citizens
from his church community in California.

June 18, 2025
Audit Firms Agree to $46 Million Settlement in GPB Capital Fraud Case

In a significant development in the GPB Capital fraud litigation, several audit firms have agreed to pay a combined $46 million to settle claims tied to their alleged involvement in the $1.8 billion scheme that impacted roughly 15,000 investors, as reported by DI Wire.