Waddell & Reed Ordered to Pay $776,000 Over Reverse Churning

Posted on October 6th, 2022 at 2:48 PM
Waddell & Reed Ordered to Pay $776,000 Over Reverse Churning

From the Desk of Jim Eccleston at Eccleston Law.

Waddell & Reed has agreed to pay nearly $776,000 to settle charges of misconduct over one of its wrap fee programs, according to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

Waddell & Reed breached its fiduciary duty by failing to take appropriate action after the firm flagged certain client accounts for potential “reverse churning”, according to the SEC’s order. Specifically, the flagged accounts each belonged to certain clients participating in the MAPLatitude wrap fee program at Waddell & Reed. Waddell & Reed agreed to a cease-and-desist order and a censure without admitting or denying any of the SEC’s findings. The firm additionally agreed to pay disgorgement of $484,645, prejudgement interest of $90,944, and a $200,000 civil penalty, according to the SEC.

Reverse churning typically occurs when a client is charged a wrap fee covering all advisory services and transaction costs despite the fact that the client trades infrequently, according to the SEC’s order. Waddell’s compliance policies and procedures required the firm to conduct quarterly reviews to determine whether the wrap fee program continued to be suitable for certain clients. Between January 2015 and July 2021, Waddell & Reed flagged 737 MAPLatitude accounts that should have been converted from fee-based to brokerage accounts under firm policy, according to the SEC. However, the SEC alleged that Waddell failed to complete any follow-up reviews or appropriately convert the accounts.

Eccleston Law LLC represents investors and financial advisors nationwide in securities, employment, regulatory and disciplinary matters.

Tags: eccleston, eccleston law, advisors, sec, churning

Return to Archive

TESTIMONIALS

Previous
Next

Jim, Stephany and the whole team were a God send.  We felt like we were put into a situation where we had no advocate. Jim’s team came in with a strong, well laid out strategy on how to get our story heard. Where our outside compliance company had no ability to help, our Broker Dealer was impenitent, and the regulators were aggressive pursuing vague rules, Jim came like a barricade against an assault we did not understand. Though you pay member dues to be affiliated with FINRA and a B/D, you have no voice. The only thing that is truly heard in this un-level playing field is a bulldog’s bark like Jim’s. I would encourage anyone to call Jim and his team to find a real ally in the tough and complicated world of securities regulation. They are truly the best.

Greg P.

LATEST NEWS AND ARTICLES

February 27, 2026
Eighth Circuit Rejects Emergency Injunction in Advisor Departure Dispute

A federal appeals court ruled against an advisory firm seeking immediate, injunctive relief after a team of advisors left with hundreds of millions in client assets.

February 26, 2026
FINRA Bars Former Cambridge Advisor After Refusal to Cooperate With Communications Probe

A former advisor affiliated with Cambridge Investment Research has been barred from the securities industry after declining to comply with a regulatory investigation, according to the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA).

February 25, 2026
Advisors Increase Crypto Allocations as Merrill Lynch Warns of Significant Risks

Financial advisors are placing more client assets into digital currencies, even as major firms caution investors about the asset class's volatility and speculative nature.