U.S. Supreme Court Rules Title VII Covers Gender Identity and Sexual Orientation

Posted on June 19th, 2020 at 10:04 AM
U.S. Supreme Court Rules Title VII Covers Gender Identity and Sexual Orientation

From the Desk of Jim Eccleston at Eccleston Law LLC:

In a landmark ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act prohibits discrimination based on gender identity and sexual orientation. Justice Gorsuch wrote the opinion, and was joined by Justices Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan and Chief Justice Roberts. The majority found that sexual orientation and gender identity was covered by the portion of the Civil Rights Act which bans discrimination “because of . . . sex.” 

In the majority opinion, the court held that an employer violates the Civil Rights Act “when it intentionally fires an individual employee based in part on sex.”  The Supreme Court further held that sex is an aspect of an person’s gender identity or sexual orientation, so an employer “necessarily intentionally discriminate[s] against that individual in part because of sex” when an employer fires an employee on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity.  

This decision resolves a circuit split among the federal circuit courts. Justices Kavanaugh, Alito and Thomas dissented.

The attorneys of Eccleston Law LLC represent investors and advisors nationwide in securities and employment matters. The securities lawyers at Eccleston Law also practice a variety of other areas of practice for financial investors and advisors including Securities FraudCompliance ProtectionBreach of Fiduciary DutyFINRA Matters, and much more. Our attorneys draw on a combined experience of nearly 65 years in delivering the highest quality legal services. If you are in need of legal services, contact us to schedule a one-on-one consultation today.

Related Attorneys: James J. Eccleston

Tags: eccleston, james eccleston, eccleston law, civil rights

Return to Archive

TESTIMONIALS

Previous
Next

You guys are good!

Mike L.

LATEST NEWS AND ARTICLES

July 26, 2024
Kentucky Advisor Sues LPL Financial for Alleged Corporate Raid

A Kentucky advisor, Mark Lamkin, has filed a lawsuit against LPL Financial, claiming the independent broker-dealer orchestrated a corporate raid that resulted in the loss of his firm’s entire book of managed assets.

July 25, 2024
FINRA Plans Fee Increases Amid Rising Costs and Losses

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has announced plans to raise fees for its approximately 3,300 broker-dealer member firms. According to AdvisorHub, the self-regulator faces soaring costs, as detailed in its annual report published at the end of June.

July 24, 2024
Raymond James Settles with Oregon Over Excessive Commissions

Raymond James recently settled a case with Oregon's Division of Financial Regulation (“DFR”), agreeing to pay nearly $200,000 over allegations of charging excessive commissions to retail investors.