The Estate Analyst: Exploiting DSUE Portability Revenue Procedure 2014-18 & Mysteries of The Wang Estates

Posted on February 28th, 2014 at 5:00 PM

By Robert L. Moshman, Esq.

It was the end of days, Tax-pocalypse, where space and time warped to form the end of the estate tax (and the beginning), a reversion to 2001, and a combination of the stepped-up basis and carryover basis for assets held at death. But then came 2011, and the estate tax was reinstated by Congress with a $5-million exemption and a brand-new portability provision to salvage the unused estate tax exemption of the first spouse to die.  

The specific background of portability was recently summarized in Revenue Procedure 2014-18 as follows:

“Sections 302(a)(1) and 303(a) of the Tax Relief, Unemployment Insurance Reauthorization, and Job Creation Act of 2010 (TRUIRJCA), Pub. L. No. 111–312, 124 Stat. 3296, 3302 (2010), amended §2010(c) of the Code to allow the estate of a decedent who is survived by a spouse to make a portability election, which allows the surviving spouse to apply the decedent’s DSUE amount to the surviving spouse’s own transfers during life and at death. The portability election applies to estates of decedents dying after December 31, 2010, if such decedent was survived by a spouse. The portability provisions under § 2010(c) of the Code were scheduled to expire on January 1, 2013, pursuant to § 304 of TRUIRJCA. However, § 101(a) of the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012, Pub. L. No. 112–rev. 0, 126 Stat. 2313 (ATRA), made portability permanent.”

Inside a Gift Horse’s Mouth

The portability of the DSUE to a surviving spouse is a concept with multiple connotations, mostly positive. Deferring taxation is good. Exemptions from tax are even better. So preserving a deceased spouse’s estate tax exemption is a useful tool. Thanks, Congress...

For more, read the full PDF here

Tags:

Return to Archive

TESTIMONIALS

Previous
Next

If the regulators are after you, and are trying to make a case against you, and you are going to contest their allegations against you, make sure you have the best securities industry defense lawyers, Eccleston Law Firm. My case was spun into a combination of penalties including fines, cash settlements, CE courses and suspension. They were the best I have seen in action. When all was said and done, they had done their magic, my situation was negotiated and settled with a simple "letter of caution" and a case closed without action. It is the most important legal business decision you will ever make, make it Eccleston Law.

Rick R.

LATEST NEWS AND ARTICLES

August 12, 2022
SEC Charges J.P. Morgan, UBS, and TradeStation for Deficiencies Pertaining to the Prevention of Customer Identify Theft

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has charged J.P. Morgan Securities, UBS Financial Services, and TradeStation Securities over deficiencies in their programs designed to prevent client identify theft, which violates the SEC’s Identity Theft Red Flags Rule, or Regulation S-ID.

August 11, 2022
FINRA Suspends Former Schwab Advisor for Failing to Disclose Felony Charges

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has suspended a former Charles Schwab advisor who allegedly failed to disclose multiple felony charges.

August 10, 2022
UBS Wealth Group’s Legal Costs Skyrocket in Q2

UBS Wealth’s litigation expenses have substantially spiked in the second quarter as the firm has faced a host of investor complaints and regulatory probes into UBS’ volatile Yield Enhancement Strategy (YES).