Some Revenue Generated By Firms May Not Be Worth Much in Acquisition

Posted on November 13th, 2013 at 4:54 PM

From the Desk of Jim Eccleston at Eccleston Law Offices:

Certain revenue that a firm generates may actually reduce its valuation in an acquisition.  The M&A market wants revenues that both are recurring and stable.  The market severely discounts non-recurring revenues because of the unpredictability of the future cash flows. 

            The “right” kind of revenue includes, among others, the “fee-only” model, in which advisers are compensated directly and exclusively by their clients.  In addition, history has shown that fee-only firms with this type of billing arrangement have remarkably low rates of client departure.  Other revenues that likewise are recurring and somewhat stable include: retainer fees and family office types of service fees. 

            On the other hand, the “wrong” kind of revenue exists.  First, trading or product-based commissions.  Commissions may generate an immediate rush of cash flow in the short-term but have a long-term negative impact on valuation, as there is a risk that they are non-recurring.  They also may create a structural conflict of interest between adviser and client which could jeopardize the future stability of client relationships.  Moreover, trails are considered to be the “wrong” kind of revenue.  Those factors affect the valuations as well as the way we advise both buyers and sellers of advisory firms.  

The attorneys of Eccleston Law Offices represent investors and advisers nationwide in securities and employment matters. Our attorneys draw on a combined experience of nearly 50 years in delivering the highest quality legal services.

Related Attorneys: James J. Eccleston

Tags:

Return to Archive

TESTIMONIALS

Previous
Next

Fantastic news!!!!  Your professionalism, support and expertise were greatly appreciated.  You made a difficult situation much more bearable.

Marci M.

LATEST NEWS AND ARTICLES

February 14, 2025
Jefferies Financial Group Dismisses Miami Advisory Team Amid Alleged Misconduct

Jefferies Financial Group recently terminated a team of Miami-based wealth advisors following allegations of improper money transfers and the use of unauthorized communication methods to conceal the activity.

February 13, 2025
FINRA Panel Denies J.P. Morgan's $39.7 Million Claim Against Former Advisor

A FINRA arbitration panel recently rejected J.P. Morgan Securities’ bid to recover $39.7 million in damages from Edward Turley, a former financial advisor whose alleged
misconduct led the firm to incur significant settlement costs.

February 12, 2025
Edward Jones Advisor Barred by FINRA Over Allegations of Unauthorized Account Changes

FINRA has barred Gwendolyn J. Hayes, a former Edward Jones advisor in Oregon after allegations surfaced that she altered client account information without authorization.