Small Investment Advisers Commonly Lack Funds or Insurance to Compensate Clients

Posted on July 29th, 2019 at 11:35 AM
Small Investment Advisers Commonly Lack Funds or Insurance to Compensate Clients

From the Desk of Jim Eccleston at Eccleston Law LLC:

In many cases, small investment advisers do not possess enough capital or insurance to compensate clients when its advisers have wronged investors. Those advisers often operate from small offices that lack constant oversight from financial regulators. In fact, those money managers are 1.5 times as likely to file for bankruptcy within a year of a legal settlement resulting from a client dispute. Additionally, these same advisers are 3 times more likely to retain an unpaid judgement on its record.

Recent regulatory and structural changes have favored the practice of charging steady fees rather than trading commissions, which has fueled growth in the investment adviser business model. For instance, the number of individual investors that utilize investment advisers instead of brokers has increased by 33% since 2008. Small investment advisers are often feebly capitalized, which hinders those firms from carrying sufficient insurance to cover any large legal settlement that occurs. Investors that aim to sue smaller money managers typically discover that the firm is too small to necessitate an attorney’s involvement.

In January 2018, Oregon became the first state to require at least a $1 million “errors and omissions” insurance policy for brokers and advisers. This statute aims to protect investors from risks other than only theft, such as negligent advice directly causing losses. Numerous investment advisers claim that insurance is not necessary because brokers and banks often hold clients’ securities, which effectively mitigates the risk of failure or theft. Nevertheless, the SEC is considering whether to implement some form of insurance requirement for money managers nation-wide. According to the SEC, 91% of federally regulated investment advisers possess direct responsibility for the securities that exist in its clients’ portfolios.

The attorneys of Eccleston Law LLC represent investors and advisors nationwide in securities and employment matters. The securities lawyers at Eccleston Law also practice a variety of other areas of practice for financial investors and advisors including Securities FraudCompliance ProtectionBreach of Fiduciary DutyFINRA Matters, and much more. Our attorneys draw on a combined experience of nearly 65 years in delivering the highest quality legal services. If you are in need of legal services, contact us to schedule a one-on-one consultation today.

Related Attorneys: James J. Eccleston

Tags: james eccleston, eccleston law, eccleston law llc, eccleston, investment advisers, insurance, financial compensation, sec, tradiing commissions

Return to Archive

TESTIMONIALS

Previous
Next

If the regulators are after you, and are trying to make a case against you, and you are going to contest their allegations against you, make sure you have the best securities industry defense lawyers, Eccleston Law Firm. My case was spun into a combination of penalties including fines, cash settlements, CE courses and suspension. They were the best I have seen in action. When all was said and done, they had done their magic, my situation was negotiated and settled with a simple "letter of caution" and a case closed without action. It is the most important legal business decision you will ever make, make it Eccleston Law.

Rick R.

LATEST NEWS AND ARTICLES

July 26, 2024
Kentucky Advisor Sues LPL Financial for Alleged Corporate Raid

A Kentucky advisor, Mark Lamkin, has filed a lawsuit against LPL Financial, claiming the independent broker-dealer orchestrated a corporate raid that resulted in the loss of his firm’s entire book of managed assets.

July 25, 2024
FINRA Plans Fee Increases Amid Rising Costs and Losses

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has announced plans to raise fees for its approximately 3,300 broker-dealer member firms. According to AdvisorHub, the self-regulator faces soaring costs, as detailed in its annual report published at the end of June.

July 24, 2024
Raymond James Settles with Oregon Over Excessive Commissions

Raymond James recently settled a case with Oregon's Division of Financial Regulation (“DFR”), agreeing to pay nearly $200,000 over allegations of charging excessive commissions to retail investors.