SEC Seeks to Expand “Dealer” Definition to Expand Regulatory Oversight

Posted on April 11th, 2023 at 8:47 AM
SEC Seeks to Expand “Dealer” Definition to Expand Regulatory Oversight

From the desk of Jim Eccleston at Eccleston Law 

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is seeking to expand its definition of “securities dealers”, which has resulted in criticism from various private fund and investment advisors that wish to avoid additional regulatory oversight.

The SEC is finalizing a rule that would expand the definition to include some financial advisory firms, including high-frequency traders, which traditionally have not been considered securities dealers. Investor advocates contend that the SEC uses lawsuits against penny-stock flippers to indicate that a “securities dealer” is any company whose business model revolves around buying and selling securities. According to industry experts, the expanded definition of “dealer” will likely implicate several businesses, including hedge funds and venture capital funds. Funds that are required to register under the new definition could seek to alter their investment strategies to avoid heightened regulation, according to industry sources.

Critics of the SEC’s expanded definition have pointed to a case that the SEC won against Ibrahim Almagarby and his Florida-based company, Microcap Equity Group (MEG). Almagarby launched MEG, which would buy aged debt from penny stock issuers before converting the debt into equity for discounted prices and selling the new shares for a profit, according to the SEC. The SEC alleged that Almagarby and MEG generated at least $1.4 million, but the district court determined that MEG was a dealer because the company’s business model was based on quickly unloading equity shares. MEG appealed to the Eleventh Circuit, which is expected to rule on the case this year. While the Eleventh Circuit considers Almagarby’s case, the SEC is working to finalize its rule that would require more firms to register as dealers. The SEC’s proposal notes certain standards that can trigger the dealer classification, including regularly making comparable purchases and selling the same securities in one day.

 

Eccleston Law LLC represents financial advisors and investors nationwide in securities, employment, transition, regulatory and disciplinary matters.

Tags: eccleston, eccleston law

Return to Archive

TESTIMONIALS

Previous
Next

Jim, Stephany and the whole team were a God send.  We felt like we were put into a situation where we had no advocate. Jim’s team came in with a strong, well laid out strategy on how to get our story heard. Where our outside compliance company had no ability to help, our Broker Dealer was impenitent, and the regulators were aggressive pursuing vague rules, Jim came like a barricade against an assault we did not understand. Though you pay member dues to be affiliated with FINRA and a B/D, you have no voice. The only thing that is truly heard in this un-level playing field is a bulldog’s bark like Jim’s. I would encourage anyone to call Jim and his team to find a real ally in the tough and complicated world of securities regulation. They are truly the best.

Greg P.

LATEST NEWS AND ARTICLES

January 27, 2026
FINRA Sanctions, Criminal Cases, and Industry Bars in 2025

AdvisorHub has compiled a year-end review of enforcement actions and criminal proceedings.

January 26, 2026
James Eccleston Named 2026 Super Lawyer in Securities Litigation

Eccleston Law announces James Eccleston's selection to the 2026 Illinois Super Lawyers list, continuing a track record of excellence since 2005.

January 26, 2026
FINRA Enforcement Actions for Reg BI Violations Surge Past 2024 Levels

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) already has brought more Regulation Best Interest cases in 2025 than it did during all of 2024, according to statements from the regulator’s top enforcement official and a review of FINRA’s disciplinary records by AdvisorHub.