SEC Panel Calls for Tighter Limits on RIAs' Mandatory Arbitration Clauses

Posted on July 2nd, 2025 at 2:16 PM
SEC Panel Calls for Tighter Limits on RIAs' Mandatory Arbitration Clauses

From the desk of Jim Eccleston at Eccleston Law

AdvisorHub reports that the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Investor Advisory Committee has finalized a recommendation urging the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) to rein in the use of mandatory arbitration clauses by registered investment advisers (“RIA”s). After raising concerns over two years ago, the committee voted to formally advise the SEC to improve fairness and transparency in how customer disputes are handled.

The recommendation outlines four key actions. First, the SEC should align arbitration standards for RIAs with existing Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) rules governing broker-dealers. Those rules prohibit class action waivers and require arbitration hearings to take place near the client’s residence.

Second, RIAs should notify clients of any mandatory arbitration clauses and disclose arbitration outcomes. The committee also called for a requirement that RIAs include arbitration provisions within their Form ADV disclosures. Third, the SEC should establish a publicly accessible, searchable database of arbitration awards for RIAs, similar to FINRA’s existing arbitration records and BrokerCheck disclosures for broker-dealers.

Finally, the committee urged the SEC to investigate RIA arbitration practices further and produce educational resources to help investors understand arbitration procedures and identify key questions to raise with their advisers.

As reported by AdvisorHub, the recommendations follow a 2023 study examining 579 advisory agreements. The findings revealed that 61 percent contained mandatory arbitration clauses, with several including troubling provisions — such as requiring customers to bear arbitration costs, limiting potential damages, or restricting types of claims. Notably, 97 percent of these agreements failed to factor in the client’s location when selecting hearing venues.

Although the Investor Advisory Committee does not set regulatory policy, it made clear that applying consistent arbitration protections across both investment advisers and brokerage firms aligns with an adviser’s fiduciary duty to act in the client’s best interest, according to AdvisorHub.

 

Eccleston Law LLC represents investors and financial advisors nationwide in securities, employment, transition, regulatory, and disciplinary matters.

Tags: eccleston, eccleston law, sec

Return to Archive

TESTIMONIALS

Previous
Next

The work that you and your team have performed on my behalf is exemplary.

JT

LATEST NEWS AND ARTICLES

February 19, 2026
Wall Street Journal Analysis Questions Investor Gains Following DuPont's Decade-Long Breakup

A Wall Street Journal analysis has raised questions about investor returns following DuPont’s multi-year corporate restructuring, which divided the historic conglomerate into multiple independent companies.

February 18, 2026
American Portfolios Ordered to Pay $4.6 Million in Restitution Over Cash Sweep Program Disclosures

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has ordered American Portfolios Financial Services to return $4.6 million to customers and pay monetary sanctions after determining that the firm overcharged investors and failed to properly disclose how it generated revenue through a cash sweep program.

February 17, 2026
FINRA Fines Kingswood Capital Partners $150,000 for Supervisory Failures in GWG L Bond Sales

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) censured and fined San Diego–based broker-dealer Kingswood Capital Partners $150,000 after finding supervisory failures tied to sales of high-risk GWG L bonds.