Tr?id=566623520170033&ev=PageView&noscript=1

SEC Panel Calls for Tighter Limits on RIAs' Mandatory Arbitration Clauses

Posted on July 2nd, 2025 at 2:16 PM
SEC Panel Calls for Tighter Limits on RIAs' Mandatory Arbitration Clauses

From the desk of Jim Eccleston at Eccleston Law

AdvisorHub reports that the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Investor Advisory Committee has finalized a recommendation urging the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) to rein in the use of mandatory arbitration clauses by registered investment advisers (“RIA”s). After raising concerns over two years ago, the committee voted to formally advise the SEC to improve fairness and transparency in how customer disputes are handled.

The recommendation outlines four key actions. First, the SEC should align arbitration standards for RIAs with existing Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) rules governing broker-dealers. Those rules prohibit class action waivers and require arbitration hearings to take place near the client’s residence.

Second, RIAs should notify clients of any mandatory arbitration clauses and disclose arbitration outcomes. The committee also called for a requirement that RIAs include arbitration provisions within their Form ADV disclosures. Third, the SEC should establish a publicly accessible, searchable database of arbitration awards for RIAs, similar to FINRA’s existing arbitration records and BrokerCheck disclosures for broker-dealers.

Finally, the committee urged the SEC to investigate RIA arbitration practices further and produce educational resources to help investors understand arbitration procedures and identify key questions to raise with their advisers.

As reported by AdvisorHub, the recommendations follow a 2023 study examining 579 advisory agreements. The findings revealed that 61 percent contained mandatory arbitration clauses, with several including troubling provisions — such as requiring customers to bear arbitration costs, limiting potential damages, or restricting types of claims. Notably, 97 percent of these agreements failed to factor in the client’s location when selecting hearing venues.

Although the Investor Advisory Committee does not set regulatory policy, it made clear that applying consistent arbitration protections across both investment advisers and brokerage firms aligns with an adviser’s fiduciary duty to act in the client’s best interest, according to AdvisorHub.

 

Eccleston Law LLC represents investors and financial advisors nationwide in securities, employment, transition, regulatory, and disciplinary matters.

Tags: eccleston, eccleston law, sec

Return to Archive

TESTIMONIALS

Previous
Next
Quotes Bigger

We just wanted to say thanks for your work in helping us get back some of the money we lost. We are not by any means rich, but we have saved some money and we have done so through a tight-fisted approach to most everything we do. So losing a significant chunk of money hurt…especially at a time when everyone else was growing their accounts. We really appreciate the work you did.

Allan and Adele

LATEST NEWS AND ARTICLES

1780415363 Law
June 2, 2026
SEC Charges California Trader in Alleged $43 Million Ponzi-Like Scheme

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has filed a civil action against a California day trader accused of operating a $43 million Ponzi-like scheme that allegedly defrauded more than 400 investors.

1780328948 Law
June 1, 2026
Massachusetts Regulators Fine Fidelity $1.25 Million Over Data Breach Allegations

Massachusetts regulators has fined Fidelity Brokerage Services $1.25 million over allegations that the firm failed to adequately protect customer information and properly notify all affected individuals following a significant data breach.

1780079651 Law
May 29, 2026
SEC Investigating Fraud Allegations in Private Credit Industry

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) actively is investigating allegations of fraud involving private credit firms, signaling continued regulatory scrutiny of the rapidly expanding sector.