SEC Examines Fund Payments to Brokerage Firms

Posted on September 12th, 2014 at 11:27 AM

From the Desk of Jim Eccleston at Eccleston Law Offices

The SEC has begun a review of fees paid by mutual funds to brokerages and their financial advisors to encourage fund sales. Unfortunately, the SEC has found that those fees are not clearly disclosed under regulators’ current requirements.

There are no clear standards on what information brokerage firms, financial advisers and mutual funds need to tell investors about fees, leading to a great disparity in what they disclose in regulatory filings and on trade confirmations. A final analysis of the fee infrastructure and disclosure holes is expected to be completed by year-end. That could lead to an overhaul of how the industry pays for sales and how the brokerage industry discloses the bounty it collects. 

In recent years, brokerage firms have demanded more sales support and payments than ever before from their fund partners. Brokers also are leaning on fund companies to pay for record-keeping services that traditionally were provided by third-party firms. In addition, fund companies have acquiesced to paying higher fees in order to appear on brokerage firms' recommended lists. While all that is transpiring, however, investors are told that financial advisers' pay is not tied to sales of specific funds, and that the selection of funds is based on quantitative and qualitative criteria.

There is no industry-wide data on how much money changes hands every year between mutual fund companies and U.S. brokerage firms, but a review of individual disclosures show they can add up. Morgan Stanley, which has one of the most detailed disclosures in the industry, last year received $25.3 million from 39 companies to be "Fund Family Partners". That relationship allows fund companies to "receive supplemental sales information and additional opportunities to sponsor firm events and promote their funds to our financial advisors and clients." Morgan Stanley also received at least another $250,000 from each of 104 fund families in "shelf space" fees.

Likewise, Ameriprise Financial Services last year received more than $210 million from 29 fund companies for shelf space and conference support. Ameriprise did not disclose how much it received from about 270 other fund families whose products also can be bought via its sales force. 

The attorneys of Eccleston Law Offices represent investors and advisers nationwide in securities and employment matters. Our attorneys draw on a combined experience of nearly 50 years in delivering the highest quality legal services.

Related Attorneys: James J. Eccleston

Tags:

Return to Archive

TESTIMONIALS

Previous
Next

I learned two important things working with Eccleston Law. First, I made a friend and ally with Jim and Steph for life. Secondly, and this is a crucial life lesson - if you need counsel, then seek out the very best. Jim was referred to me by a most trusted source. I've never had to hire an attorney for anything. Now, I know the value of hiring an important partner. Meticulous, thorough and detailed in preparation is the best way to describe Jim. Brilliant too, I might add. Bottom line, I would highly highly recommend Jim and Stephany for your legal needs. One of the best life decisions I've ever made.

Howard S.

LATEST NEWS AND ARTICLES

October 2, 2024
SEC Charges Two South Florida Men for Defrauding Venezuelan-American Investors in $5 Million Scheme

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has filed a complaint against two South Florida men, Francisco Javier Malave Hernandez and Ricardo Javier Guerra Farias, for orchestrating a multi-million dollar investment fraud that targeted members of the Venezuelan-American community.

October 1, 2024
California Advisor Suspended and Fined for Churning Client Accounts

A veteran advisor in Santa Maria, California, Stewart "Paxton" Ginn, has been suspended for 18 months and fined $50,000 by FINRA, according to AdvisorHub

September 30, 2024
Bank of America and Merrill Lynch Settle with FINRA for Supervisory Failures

Bank of America and its subsidiary, Merrill Lynch, have agreed to a $3 million fine and censure as part of a settlement with FINRA over long-term supervisory failures.