SEC Charges Former Advisor with $2 Million Fraudulent Scheme

Posted on November 21st, 2023 at 1:56 PM
SEC Charges Former Advisor with $2 Million Fraudulent Scheme

From the desk of Jim Eccleston at Eccleston Law 

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has announced the filing of charges against an investment adviser based in Santa Maria, California. Julie Anne Darrah is alleged to have defrauded a minimum of nine elderly female advisory clients, causing losses exceeding $2 million.

As outlined in the SEC's complaint, Julie Anne Darrah and her firm, Vivid Financial Management Inc., are accused of misappropriating approximately $2.25 million from clients who had engaged their services as investment advisers. The complaint asserts that Darrah primarily targeted elderly female advisory clients, many of whom had become dependent on her for their financial well-being. This included one client residing in a memory care facility. The complaint details that Darrah took control of her victims' assets by assuming the role of trustee for their trusts, utilizing standing letters of authorization to transfer funds from their brokerage accounts to their bank accounts, becoming the signatory on their bank accounts, or obtaining power of attorney over their property and accounts.

According to the SEC, Darrah transferred her victims' funds into her bank accounts, mixing these funds with her own money. She utilized this commingled pool of resources for various purposes, including acquiring and enhancing real estate properties, covering personal expenses, purchasing luxury vehicles, and operating restaurant businesses at a financial loss. In an attempt to conceal her fraudulent activities, Darrah altered client account mailing addresses to her address, falsely representing that she was not acting as a trustee for any clients, and had a client initial two backdated promissory notes, which she subsequently provided to the SEC in response to its subpoenas.

The complaint seeks remedies that include the disgorgement of allegedly ill-gotten gains, prejudgment interest, monetary penalties, and the imposition of permanent and conduct-based injunctions. As reported by DIWire, Darrah has consented to a preliminary injunction being issued against her and an order freezing assets, mandating an accounting, prohibiting the destruction of documents, and allowing for expedited discovery.

 

Eccleston Law LLC represents investors and financial advisors nationwide in securities, employment, transition, regulatory, and disciplinary matters.

Tags: eccleston, eccleston law, sec

Return to Archive

TESTIMONIALS

Previous
Next

If the regulators are after you, and are trying to make a case against you, and you are going to contest their allegations against you, make sure you have the best securities industry defense lawyers, Eccleston Law Firm. My case was spun into a combination of penalties including fines, cash settlements, CE courses and suspension. They were the best I have seen in action. When all was said and done, they had done their magic, my situation was negotiated and settled with a simple "letter of caution" and a case closed without action. It is the most important legal business decision you will ever make, make it Eccleston Law.

Rick R.

LATEST NEWS AND ARTICLES

February 3, 2026
FINRA Accuses Spartan Capital of Widespread Churning That Allegedly Harmed Customers

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has brought a disciplinary complaint against Spartan Capital Securities and several senior leaders of the New York City–based broker-dealer, alleging that the firm facilitated excessive trading that generated millions of dollars in revenue while causing substantial losses to customers.

February 2, 2026
California Investors Allege Unsuitable DST Recommendations in FINRA Arbitration

Two investors from the San Francisco Bay Area have filed a FINRA arbitration claim against brokerage firm Realized Financial and its financial advisors.

January 30, 2026
FINRA Arbitration Panel Orders J.P. Morgan to Amend Form U-5, Flags Potential Pattern of Conduct

A Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) arbitration panel recently issued an unusually detailed decision in a dispute between J.P. Morgan Securities and former advisor Joshua David Sappi Biering, shedding rare light on how a firm may deploy - and sometimes abuse - the Form U-5 during advisor departures.