Robinhood and Other Brokerages Restrict Customers From Cashing In Profitable Put Options On Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank

Posted on March 16th, 2023 at 4:12 PM

From the Desk of Jim Eccleston at Eccleston Law

Robinhood is restricting customers from cashing in on their bets against Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank even as put options appear to be in the money, according to several Robinhood customers on Twitter.

Put options generally permit investors to bet that the price of a stock will decline. If the stock price declines, then the investor may sell the stock at a higher price in comparison to current market value. Several Robinhood customers purchased put options on Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank not long before each bank collapsed. According to some Robinhood users, the trading app is not permitting investors to sell their put options, and many of the option contracts expire on Friday. Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev tweeted on Wednesday that the company was “working to resolve this ASAP”. Robinhood and other brokerages face challenges in permitting customers to sell their put options because the shares are no longer officially traded, which will create logistical issues. Furthermore, the put options have limited demand based on the economic state of each bank, while there exists a lack of downside remaining to capitalize on.

However, Robinhood is not alone. Several other brokerages, including Fidelity, Charles Schwab, TD Ameritrade, and E-Trade, likewise are restricting customers from selling their put options on each bank. The brokerages have noted that traders will likely be out of luck unless they possess the shares to satisfy the put contracts, or the shares begin trading again prior to expiration of the put contracts. Interactive Brokers has announced that the company will honor the put contracts on Friday so long as customers own the shares or have the capital to pay for borrowing the shares, and other brokerages may follow suit with this strategy. Nevertheless, Robinhood appears to be facing the most scrutiny based on the company’s alleged history of failing to meet investor demand. As Robinhood users continue to bombard the company on social media, prominent short-seller Marc Cohodes offered a piece of advice: call a lawyer.

Eccleston Law LLC represents investors and financial advisors nationwide in securities, employment, regulatory and disciplinary matters. 

Tags: eccleston, eccleston law

Return to Archive

TESTIMONIALS

Previous
Next

I learned two important things working with Eccleston Law. First, I made a friend and ally with Jim and Steph for life. Secondly, and this is a crucial life lesson - if you need counsel, then seek out the very best. Jim was referred to me by a most trusted source. I've never had to hire an attorney for anything. Now, I know the value of hiring an important partner. Meticulous, thorough and detailed in preparation is the best way to describe Jim. Brilliant too, I might add. Bottom line, I would highly highly recommend Jim and Stephany for your legal needs. One of the best life decisions I've ever made.

Howard S.

LATEST NEWS AND ARTICLES

September 5, 2025
Merrill Lynch Advisor Faces FINRA Disciplinary Action for Refusing to Cooperate with Investigation

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has initiated disciplinary proceedings against former Merrill Lynch broker Ali F. Chehab of Portland, Oregon. According to ThinkAdvisor, FINRA alleges that he refused to cooperate in an investigation into potential misconduct, including unauthorized trading and material misrepresentati...

September 4, 2025
Wells Fargo Ties $2,000 Bonus to Non-Solicitation Clause, Raising Advisor Concerns

Wells Fargo & Co. recently issued a $2,000 bank-wide award to its 215,000 employees, following the Federal Reserve’s June decision to lift its asset growth restrictions.

September 3, 2025
Kansas City Advisory Firms Agree to $25.5 Million Settlement Over No-Poach Allegations

Mariner Wealth Advisors, along with two other Kansas City-area firms, has agreed to a $25.5 million class action settlement over allegations that they illegally agreed not to solicit each other’s advisors.