Responding to FINRA Enforcement 8210 Inquiries – Part 2

Posted on February 25th, 2020 at 3:31 PM
Responding to FINRA Enforcement 8210 Inquiries – Part 2

From the Desk of Jim Eccleston at Eccleston Law LLC:

This is the second part of a three-part series.

As discussed in part one of this three-part series, written inquiries made pursuant to FINRA Rule 8210 are a tool used by FINRA Enforcement when investigating registered representatives for potential violations.  Rule 8210 requires registered representatives to comply with FINRA’s requests for information and documents.

A mistake some financial advisors make when responding to a FINRA 8210 inquiry is not hiring legal counsel. Many advisors are not aware of the multitude of securities rules and regulations that FINRA may be considering, both at the inception of any inquiry and – importantly – later as the investigation unfolds. 

Likewise, a financial advisor may inadvertently admit to wrongdoing if she/he responds to an 8210 inquiry on their own. A financial advisor may say too much, say too little, or produce documents which could implicate the financial advisor in violations of securities rules or regulations. Hiring legal counsel with experience responding to FINRA 8210 inquiries can help advisors craft a response that avoids the mistakes often made by advisors who respond on their own.

The attorneys of Eccleston Law LLC represent investors and advisors nationwide in securities and employment matters. The securities lawyers at Eccleston Law also practice a variety of other areas of practice for financial investors and advisors including Securities FraudCompliance ProtectionBreach of Fiduciary DutyFINRA Matters, and much more. Our attorneys draw on a combined experience of nearly 65 years in delivering the highest quality legal services. If you are in need of legal services, contact us to schedule a one-on-one consultation today. 

Related Attorneys: James J. Eccleston

Tags: james eccleston, eccleston law, eccleston law llc, eccleston, finra, rule 8210, 8210 inquiry

Return to Archive

TESTIMONIALS

Previous
Next

If the regulators are after you, and are trying to make a case against you, and you are going to contest their allegations against you, make sure you have the best securities industry defense lawyers, Eccleston Law Firm. My case was spun into a combination of penalties including fines, cash settlements, CE courses and suspension. They were the best I have seen in action. When all was said and done, they had done their magic, my situation was negotiated and settled with a simple "letter of caution" and a case closed without action. It is the most important legal business decision you will ever make, make it Eccleston Law.

Rick R.

LATEST NEWS AND ARTICLES

October 11, 2024
Macquarie Investment Management to Pay $79.8 Million for Overvalued CMOs and Unlawful Cross Trades

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has charged Macquarie Investment Management Business Trust (MIMBT) with overvaluing collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs) and executing unlawful cross-trades that favored certain clients. 

October 10, 2024
Merrill Lynch and Harvest Volatility Management Fined $9.3 Million for Exceeding Client Investment Limits

According to SEC.gov, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has charged Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc., and Harvest Volatility Management LLC for exceeding clients’ designated investment limits, resulting in higher fees, increased market exposure, and financial losses. 

October 9, 2024
Charles Schwab Faces Lawsuit Over Failure to Prevent Elder Fraud in Computer Hack

A new lawsuit claims that Charles Schwab failed to protect an elderly client from a fraudulent scheme that drained her retirement savings.