Private Placement Due Diligence Under the Spotlight

Posted on May 27th, 2014 at 8:30 AM

From the Desk of Jim Eccleston at Eccleston Law Offices:

Based on the light oversight, exemption from the extensive financial reporting requirements, and high minimum investments, private placements are considered a high risk investment. As a result, broker-dealers need to conduct a reasonable investigation before selling them to clients. However, broker-dealers frequently rely on due diligence from outside third parties, whose independence is a concern.  According to sources, while private placement issuers pay up front their due diligence, they also have a chance to see the reports before they are published. In at least one case, a well-known third party provider changed the investment recommendation in a report so that it was a more favorable one. Later, that company collapsed in a case of fraud.

In addition, clients may not ever see the due diligence reports. Due diligence firms claim their reports aren’t designed to be read or understood by investors; rather, they are meant to help brokers decide whether to recommend a private placement. The reports usually are lengthy, with potentially alarming findings obscured in multiple pages of recondite language. 

The attorneys of Eccleston Law Offices represent investors and advisers nationwide in securities and employment matters. Our attorneys draw on a combined experience of nearly 50 years in delivering the highest quality legal services.

Related Attorneys: James J. Eccleston


Return to Archive



I cannot thank you enough for your efforts. You have proven to be a valuable resource

Jim T.


September 26, 2023
Looming Real Estate Crisis Poses Risk to U.S. Banking Sector

With the current downturn in the commercial real estate market, trillions of dollars in loans and investments pose a looming threat to both the banking industry and potentially the broader economy.

September 25, 2023
Legal Challenges Over 'Money-for-Nothing' Payments Gain Momentum

Apollo Global Management and Carlyle Group, two major private equity firms, now face investor lawsuits regarding payments made to insiders without apparent justification.

September 22, 2023
State Regulators Maintain Opposition to FINRA's Remote Supervision Pilot Program

The North American Securities Administrators Association (NASAA) and the Public Investor Advocate Bar Association (PIABA) has consistently opposed the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority's (FINRA) proposal for a voluntary three-year pilot program for remote inspections.