Morgan Stanley Fails to Halt Oregon Advisor from Soliciting Former Clients

Posted on August 19th, 2021 at 2:44 PM
Morgan Stanley Fails to Halt Oregon Advisor from Soliciting Former Clients

From the Desk of Jim Eccleston at Eccleston Law:

A former Morgan Stanley Oregon-based advisor has prevailed in a legal battle over a temporary restraining order (TRO), which restricted him from soliciting former clients at his new firm. Oregon U.S. District Court Judge Ann Aiken determined that Morgan Stanley did not meet the threshold of “extraordinary remedy” to justify the TRO, according to the opinion. Morgan Stanley alleged that Robert Sevcik, who now works for D.A. Davidson, had breached a non-solicitation agreement controlling accounts Sevcik had inherited from a retired advisor. However, Judge Aiken ruled that Morgan Stanley did not provide that the firm would suffer “irreparable harm” or that it could meet a “balance of equities” fairness test. 

Aiken discovered that Morgan Stanley showed at least one instance where Sevcik had violated non-solicitation provisions, including when Sevcik sent a bulk mailing to 4,239 households with income over $150,000. These announcements are used commonly by advisors who are attempting to move between firms and Aiken noted that they “arguably qualify an indirect attempt to solicit”. The decision is the second occasion in which Aiken has blocked Morgan Stanley’s bid for an injunction as Aiken dissolved a TRO in 2019 against a former Morgan Stanley advisor, David Sayler. Both Sevcik and Saylor had formed an inherited account agreement with a former Morgan Stanley advisor, James Maddux. After Maddux retired in 2017, the advisors agreed not to solicit Maddux’s former client’s for at least one year if they joined a new firm. 

Eccleston Law LLC represents investors and financial advisors nationwide in securities, employment, regulatory and disciplinary matters.

Tags: eccleston, eccleston law, morgan stanley

Return to Archive

TESTIMONIALS

Previous
Next

I am grateful to have found an outstanding law firm that specializes in securities matters. My lawyers were extremely knowledgeable, diligent, and are skilled litigators. No stone was left upturned. As a result of their experience and tenacity, the arbitration proceeding was dismissed in my favor.

Michael E.

LATEST NEWS AND ARTICLES

July 26, 2024
Kentucky Advisor Sues LPL Financial for Alleged Corporate Raid

A Kentucky advisor, Mark Lamkin, has filed a lawsuit against LPL Financial, claiming the independent broker-dealer orchestrated a corporate raid that resulted in the loss of his firm’s entire book of managed assets.

July 25, 2024
FINRA Plans Fee Increases Amid Rising Costs and Losses

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has announced plans to raise fees for its approximately 3,300 broker-dealer member firms. According to AdvisorHub, the self-regulator faces soaring costs, as detailed in its annual report published at the end of June.

July 24, 2024
Raymond James Settles with Oregon Over Excessive Commissions

Raymond James recently settled a case with Oregon's Division of Financial Regulation (“DFR”), agreeing to pay nearly $200,000 over allegations of charging excessive commissions to retail investors.