Missouri Federal Judge Denies Edward Jones’ Motion to Dismiss in a Pending 401(k) Plan Lawsuit

Posted on April 23rd, 2018 at 4:59 PM
Missouri Federal Judge Denies Edward Jones’ Motion to Dismiss in a Pending 401(k) Plan Lawsuit

From the Desk of Jim Eccleston at Eccleston Law LLC:

Since August 2016, several 401(k) plan participants have challenged funds Edward Jones has recommended. As a result, these 401(k) plan participants have filed a lawsuit against Edward Jones, asserting that the retirement classes of mutual funds should have been replaced with lower-cost classes that were less risky. In their complaint, the plan participants also have argued that Edward Jones breached its fiduciary duty by neglecting to negotiate a lower-cost fee arrangement with Mercer HR Services, LLC for its administrative costs.

Moreover, after the complaint was filed, Edward Jones filed a motion to dismiss in the underlying lawsuit. In its motion, Edward Jones claimed that the plan participants’ complaint failed to properly state a claim, and failed to show that the fiduciary’s decision was based on making a profit rather than a legitimate consideration.  

However, U.S. District Judge John Ross was not convinced with Edward Jones’ arguments for dismissal. In his decision, Judge Ross stated that the plan participants included plenty of details to claim the company used risky and costly funds in the plan.

Judge Ross also noted that during a time when market rates for recordkeeping services declined overall, Edward Jones failed to prudently monitor and control compensation to Mercer when its fees tripled over the proposed class period.

The attorneys of Eccleston Law LLC represent investors and advisors nationwide in securities and employment matters. The securities lawyers at Eccleston Law also practice a variety of other areas of practice for financial investors and advisors including Securities FraudCompliance ProtectionBreach of Fiduciary DutyFINRA Matters, and much more. Our attorneys draw on a combined experience of nearly 65 years in delivering the highest quality legal services. If you are in need of legal services, contact us to schedule a one-on-one consultation today.

Related Attorneys: James J. Eccleston

Tags: Eccleston, Eccleston Law, Eccleston Law LLC, James Eccleston

Return to Archive



If the regulators are after you, and are trying to make a case against you, and you are going to contest their allegations against you, make sure you have the best securities industry defense lawyers, Eccleston Law Firm. My case was spun into a combination of penalties including fines, cash settlements, CE courses and suspension. They were the best I have seen in action. When all was said and done, they had done their magic, my situation was negotiated and settled with a simple "letter of caution" and a case closed without action. It is the most important legal business decision you will ever make, make it Eccleston Law.

Rick R.


October 27, 2021
Former LPL Advisor Suspended For Completing 22 Trades Absent Client Consent

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has suspended and fined a former LPL advisor who allegedly completed 22 trades on behalf of a client without obtaining written consent. FINRA has issued a $5,000 fine and has suspended Michael Hartlett for 10 days.

October 26, 2021
Former Advisor Fails To Reverse Bar After Alleged $1 Million Theft From RBC

A former RBC Wealth Management advisor lost his bid to reverse an industry bar, according to an appellate decision issued by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA).

October 25, 2021
Firms Walk Thin Regulatory Line In Referring Self-Directed Clients To Advisors

While online trading platforms have surged in popularity during the pandemic, brokerage firms view self-directed investors as a source of new clients.