LPL Financial Faces Lawsuit Over Low Interest Rates in Cash Sweep Programs

Posted on August 5th, 2024 at 9:46 AM
LPL Financial Faces Lawsuit Over Low Interest Rates in Cash Sweep Programs

From the desk of Jim Eccleston at Eccleston Law

LPL Financial is the latest target of a lawsuit concerning the interest rates it offers on uninvested cash held in customer accounts. Financial Planning reports that the suit accuses LPL of breach of fiduciary duty, breach of contract, and unjust enrichment among other claims, concerning its cash sweep programs.

According to the lawsuit, LPL deposited its customers' uninvested cash into bank accounts that generated significant returns for the company, while customers received only minimal interest. The suit claims that customers were required to participate in these cash sweep programs to open accounts with LPL.

The lawsuit highlights LPL's reported returns on assets to illustrate the substantial profits the firm earned. For example, in the first quarter of this year, LPL's reported return-on-asset profits reached 11.8 percent, which represented 37.3 percent of the firm's total return on assets. In contrast, the suit alleges that customers earned only 0.35 percent in interest on accounts with up to $150,000, with slightly higher rates for larger balances — up to 2.2 percent for accounts holding more than $10 million.

LPL is not the only firm facing criticism and legal action over low interest rates in cash sweep programs. Merrill Lynch and Morgan Stanley also face similar lawsuits, accusing them of profiting at the expense of their customers by offering low rates compared to other brokerages and advisory firms.

 

Eccleston Law LLC represents investors and financial advisors nationwide in securities, employment, transition, regulatory, and disciplinary matters.

Tags: eccleston, eccleston law

Return to Archive

TESTIMONIALS

Previous
Next

This was the best of all possible outcomes and I cannot thank you and the team enough.

Michael S.

LATEST NEWS AND ARTICLES

February 3, 2026
FINRA Accuses Spartan Capital of Widespread Churning That Allegedly Harmed Customers

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has brought a disciplinary complaint against Spartan Capital Securities and several senior leaders of the New York City–based broker-dealer, alleging that the firm facilitated excessive trading that generated millions of dollars in revenue while causing substantial losses to customers.

February 2, 2026
California Investors Allege Unsuitable DST Recommendations in FINRA Arbitration

Two investors from the San Francisco Bay Area have filed a FINRA arbitration claim against brokerage firm Realized Financial and its financial advisors.

January 30, 2026
FINRA Arbitration Panel Orders J.P. Morgan to Amend Form U-5, Flags Potential Pattern of Conduct

A Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) arbitration panel recently issued an unusually detailed decision in a dispute between J.P. Morgan Securities and former advisor Joshua David Sappi Biering, shedding rare light on how a firm may deploy - and sometimes abuse - the Form U-5 during advisor departures.