Key Points Regarding CRD and BrokerCheck Expungement for Registered Representatives- Part 4

Posted on August 21st, 2018 at 9:07 AM
Key Points Regarding CRD and BrokerCheck Expungement for Registered Representatives- Part 4

From the Desk of Jim Eccleston at Eccleston Law LLC:

This is the fourth in a series of posts to help guide registered representatives through the process of expungement of customer complaints and other false or misleading information on their public record.  

FINRA requires that a rep’s Form U-5 be accurate and complete. In the context of FINRA Disciplinary Actions, FINRA’s Office of Hearing Officers specifically has held that filing a Form U-5 that misrepresents or omits material facts concerning the termination of a registered representative is a violation of Conduct Rule 2100 and IM-1000-1. Even more, for purposes of Section 3 on the Form U-5, FINRA Regulatory Notice 10-39, entitled Obligation to Provide Timely, Complete and Accurate, states, “[a] Firm must provide sufficient detail when responding to Form U-5 questions such that a reasonable person may understand the circumstances that triggered the affirmative response.” FINRA goes on to state:

It is not sufficient for a Firm to report only that a person’s registration was terminated because that person violated ‘Firm policy.’ If a Firm is obligated to report that a registered person was terminated because he or she violated a Firm’s policy, the Firm must identify the policy, provide sufficient facts and circumstances to enable the reader to understand what conduct was involved, and review other questions on the form to determine whether an affirmative response to any other question is required. (FINRA Reg. Notice 10-39)

 

To further emphasize the importance of full disclosure, the Form U-5 requires an appropriate signatory of a Firm to verify the accuracy and completeness of the information.  This individual accordingly must perform sufficient due diligence to make that verification.

The securities attorneys at Eccleston Law, LLC assist advisors in negotiating the language of U-5 filings, arbitrate actions involving defamatory U-5s and help advisors expunge customer complaints and other false or misleading information. Please contact our law firm at 312.332.0000 for a free consultation.

The attorneys of Eccleston Law LLC represent investors and advisors nationwide in securities and employment matters. The securities lawyers at Eccleston Law also practice a variety of other areas of practice for financial investors and advisors including Securities FraudCompliance ProtectionBreach of Fiduciary DutyFINRA Matters, and much more. Our attorneys draw on a combined experience of nearly 65 years in delivering the highest quality legal services. If you are in need of legal services, contact us to schedule a one-on-one consultation today. 

Related Attorneys: James J. Eccleston

Tags: james eccleston, eccleston law, eccleston law llc, eccleston, crd, brokercheck

Return to Archive

TESTIMONIALS

Previous
Next

You are the best attorneys in the country.

CC

LATEST NEWS AND ARTICLES

July 26, 2024
Kentucky Advisor Sues LPL Financial for Alleged Corporate Raid

A Kentucky advisor, Mark Lamkin, has filed a lawsuit against LPL Financial, claiming the independent broker-dealer orchestrated a corporate raid that resulted in the loss of his firm’s entire book of managed assets.

July 25, 2024
FINRA Plans Fee Increases Amid Rising Costs and Losses

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has announced plans to raise fees for its approximately 3,300 broker-dealer member firms. According to AdvisorHub, the self-regulator faces soaring costs, as detailed in its annual report published at the end of June.

July 24, 2024
Raymond James Settles with Oregon Over Excessive Commissions

Raymond James recently settled a case with Oregon's Division of Financial Regulation (“DFR”), agreeing to pay nearly $200,000 over allegations of charging excessive commissions to retail investors.