Jury Finds Cutter Financial Group Liable for Disclosure Failures in Annuity Sales

Posted on June 4th, 2025 at 3:50 PM
Jury Finds Cutter Financial Group Liable for Disclosure Failures in Annuity Sales

From the desk of Jim Eccleston at Eccleston Law

A federal jury in Massachusetts has found investment advisor Jeffrey Cutter and his firm, Cutter Financial Group, liable for failing to disclose significant commissions and conflicts of interest tied to an annuity replacement strategy sold to clients.

According to ThinkAdvisor, the jury deliberated for five hours before determining that Cutter and his firm violated Section 206(2) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. This provision prohibits any transaction, practice, or business course that operates as a fraud or deceit on a client or prospective client. The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) alleged that Cutter and his firm recommended fixed indexed annuities that paid large upfront commissions without adequately disclosing the firm’s financial incentives.

While the jury held the defendants accountable for failing to disclose these material conflicts, it found in Cutter’s favor on other claims brought under Sections 206(1) and 206(4), which are the anti-fraud provisions of the Advisers Act. The verdict partially vindicated Cutter’s argument that the firm did not intentionally or recklessly defraud its clients, nor did it violate SEC rules related to compliance policies and procedures.

The case has drawn industry attention, according to ThinkAdvisor. Advocacy groups such as the National Association for Fixed Annuities and Investor Choice Advocates Network (ICAN) filed amicus briefs supporting Cutter. ICAN’s founder, Nicolas Morgan, told ThinkAdvisor that the verdict warrants scrutiny, cautioning against regulatory overreach that could impose costly, unnecessary burdens on financial professionals and limit investor choices.

Cutter Financial Group announced plans to launch new educational initiatives aimed at helping clients better understand commission structures and potential conflicts of interest in financial transactions. ThinkAdvisor reports that the case may be appealed.

 

Eccleston Law LLC represents investors and financial advisors nationwide in securities, employment, transition, regulatory, and disciplinary matters.

Tags: eccleston, eccleston law

Return to Archive

TESTIMONIALS

Previous
Next

That is just fantastic! Thank you very much!

Julie N.

LATEST NEWS AND ARTICLES

February 19, 2026
Wall Street Journal Analysis Questions Investor Gains Following DuPont's Decade-Long Breakup

A Wall Street Journal analysis has raised questions about investor returns following DuPont’s multi-year corporate restructuring, which divided the historic conglomerate into multiple independent companies.

February 18, 2026
American Portfolios Ordered to Pay $4.6 Million in Restitution Over Cash Sweep Program Disclosures

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has ordered American Portfolios Financial Services to return $4.6 million to customers and pay monetary sanctions after determining that the firm overcharged investors and failed to properly disclose how it generated revenue through a cash sweep program.

February 17, 2026
FINRA Fines Kingswood Capital Partners $150,000 for Supervisory Failures in GWG L Bond Sales

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) censured and fined San Diego–based broker-dealer Kingswood Capital Partners $150,000 after finding supervisory failures tied to sales of high-risk GWG L bonds.