Jury Finds Cutter Financial Group Liable for Disclosure Failures in Annuity Sales

Posted on June 4th, 2025 at 3:50 PM
Jury Finds Cutter Financial Group Liable for Disclosure Failures in Annuity Sales

From the desk of Jim Eccleston at Eccleston Law

A federal jury in Massachusetts has found investment advisor Jeffrey Cutter and his firm, Cutter Financial Group, liable for failing to disclose significant commissions and conflicts of interest tied to an annuity replacement strategy sold to clients.

According to ThinkAdvisor, the jury deliberated for five hours before determining that Cutter and his firm violated Section 206(2) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. This provision prohibits any transaction, practice, or business course that operates as a fraud or deceit on a client or prospective client. The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) alleged that Cutter and his firm recommended fixed indexed annuities that paid large upfront commissions without adequately disclosing the firm’s financial incentives.

While the jury held the defendants accountable for failing to disclose these material conflicts, it found in Cutter’s favor on other claims brought under Sections 206(1) and 206(4), which are the anti-fraud provisions of the Advisers Act. The verdict partially vindicated Cutter’s argument that the firm did not intentionally or recklessly defraud its clients, nor did it violate SEC rules related to compliance policies and procedures.

The case has drawn industry attention, according to ThinkAdvisor. Advocacy groups such as the National Association for Fixed Annuities and Investor Choice Advocates Network (ICAN) filed amicus briefs supporting Cutter. ICAN’s founder, Nicolas Morgan, told ThinkAdvisor that the verdict warrants scrutiny, cautioning against regulatory overreach that could impose costly, unnecessary burdens on financial professionals and limit investor choices.

Cutter Financial Group announced plans to launch new educational initiatives aimed at helping clients better understand commission structures and potential conflicts of interest in financial transactions. ThinkAdvisor reports that the case may be appealed.

 

Eccleston Law LLC represents investors and financial advisors nationwide in securities, employment, transition, regulatory, and disciplinary matters.

Tags: eccleston, eccleston law

Return to Archive

TESTIMONIALS

Previous
Next

Thank You from the bottom of our hearts for all you have done for us. When we realized this was a very bad investment - we did not know where to turn for help. Then we received your name. When we called you - you were so kind to us and then agreed to help us. For this we are so very grateful. The world would be a much nicer place if there were more people like the two of you in it. We will always remember all the help and kindness you have shown us. Thank you so very very much for everything.

Wayne and Judy S.

LATEST NEWS AND ARTICLES

January 30, 2026
FINRA Arbitration Panel Orders J.P. Morgan to Amend Form U-5, Flags Potential Pattern of Conduct

A Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) arbitration panel recently issued an unusually detailed decision in a dispute between J.P. Morgan Securities and former advisor Joshua David Sappi Biering, shedding rare light on how a firm may deploy - and sometimes abuse - the Form U-5 during advisor departures.

January 29, 2026
OFAC Targets Individual Trustee, Sending a Clear Warning to Fiduciaries and Family Offices

In a rare move, the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) penalized a former U.S. government official, underscoring that professional gatekeepers can face personal liability for sanctions violations tied to trust administration.

January 28, 2026
FINRA Advances Overhaul of Outside Business Activity Rules to the SEC

FINRA formally has advanced its proposed overhaul of outside business activity (OBA) regulations to the Securities and Exchange Commission.