J.P. Morgan Seeks Restraining Order Against Advisor Who Left for Merrill

Posted on October 16th, 2018 at 10:40 AM
J.P. Morgan Seeks Restraining Order Against Advisor Who Left for Merrill

From the Desk of Jim Eccleston at Eccleston Law LLC:

This article was originally published at http://www.fundfire.com/c/2106523/250123 on October 15, 2018

By Danielle Verbrigghe

J.P. Morgan Securities is seeking a temporary restraining order against an advisor who defected for Merrill Lynch.

The firm filed a complaint in federal court last week seeking to prevent private client advisor Manuel Ruiz from soliciting his former clients or using any information retained from J.P. Morgan, pending the outcome of an arbitration case in Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) dispute resolution.

This is a common tactic taken by J.P. Morgan, and some other brokerages when advisors move to a competitor, in a bid to prevent them from bringing their clients over to the new firm.

“A TRO stops [an advisor] in his or her tracks [in] the efforts to solicit and bring over client accounts to the new firm,” says Jim Eccleston, a Chicago-based attorney who is not involved in this case. “That is a devastating consequence. As a result, courts view that remedy as extraordinary.”

J.P. Morgan says that Ruiz, who worked in the firm’s Edison and Clinton, N.J. branches, serviced more than 280 households while employed there, with an approximate $59 million in AUM at the firm. Ruiz had previously worked at Merrill Lynch before joining J.P. Morgan in 2014, FINRA records show.

Ruiz resigned from J.P. Morgan in September 2018 to re-join his old firm, and immediately began calling clients in an attempt to get them to move their accounts over to Merrill, J.P. Morgan claims in the suit. The firm alleges that the calls were more than Ruiz simply announcing his new change of employment, claiming Ruiz requested meetings with clients to discuss doing business at Merrill.

Four clients have already indicated plans to move their assets, which amount to more than $4 million, according to the complaint.

Ruiz disputed the facts laid out by J.P. Morgan, claiming in a declaration to the court that he had not solicited anyone, but had only spoken to a few clients to inform them that he had moved to Merrill Lynch.

“I believe Chase’s allegations are disingenuous,” Ruiz wrote in the declaration. “Chase provided a list of names of clients it believed had ‘solicited’. I confirmed through counsel that I did not solicit any of those clients.”

J.P. Morgan claims in its complaint that Ruiz’s alleged conduct violated the terms of his employment agreement, which contained non-solicitation and confidentiality provisions.

The outcome of cases in which a firm is seeking a temporary restraining order against an advisor often depends on the skill of the counsel and the law in the underlying jurisdiction, Eccleston explains.

“New Jersey actually has some fairly favorable laws in favor of the rep,” Eccleston says.

While Ruiz will likely have to continue to fight the firm’s claims in arbitration, preventing a TRO would be a big victory, he adds.

“If we or any other lawyer are able to defeat a TRO it’s a major battle victory in the fight, in the war really, over clients,” Eccleston says.

The attorneys of Eccleston Law LLC represent investors and advisors nationwide in securities and employment matters. The securities lawyers at Eccleston Law also practice a variety of other areas of practice for financial investors and advisors including Securities FraudCompliance ProtectionBreach of Fiduciary DutyFINRA Matters, and much more. Our attorneys draw on a combined experience of nearly 65 years in delivering the highest quality legal services. If you are in need of legal services, contact us to schedule a one-on-one consultation today.

Related Attorneys: James J. Eccleston

Tags: james eccleston, eccleston law, eccleston law llc, eccleston, jp morgan, merrill lynch

Return to Archive



I want to thank you for your excellent professional representation. It was greatly appreciated.

Michael M.


September 26, 2023
Looming Real Estate Crisis Poses Risk to U.S. Banking Sector

With the current downturn in the commercial real estate market, trillions of dollars in loans and investments pose a looming threat to both the banking industry and potentially the broader economy.

September 25, 2023
Legal Challenges Over 'Money-for-Nothing' Payments Gain Momentum

Apollo Global Management and Carlyle Group, two major private equity firms, now face investor lawsuits regarding payments made to insiders without apparent justification.

September 22, 2023
State Regulators Maintain Opposition to FINRA's Remote Supervision Pilot Program

The North American Securities Administrators Association (NASAA) and the Public Investor Advocate Bar Association (PIABA) has consistently opposed the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority's (FINRA) proposal for a voluntary three-year pilot program for remote inspections.