Jim Eccleston: UBS Clients Should be Cautious About Accepting Class Action Settlement for 100| For Investors

Posted on September 27th, 2013 at 5:13 PM

Purchasers of the 100% Principal Protected Lehman Brothers Notes should note that the class action opt out date is November 18, 2013.  UBS clients who sustained losses in the aforementioned notes will not be able to pursue their own individual FINRA arbitration claims if they do not affirmatively opt out of the class action lawsuit.  According to FINRA Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent No. 2008015443301, the firm made statements and omitted certain facts through communications to some of their financial advisors, which had the effect of misleading certain customers regarding characteristics and risks associated with investing in Lehman PPNs, including material information regarding the product’s “100% Principal Protection” feature.

            If an investor in the Notes does nothing, they will remain a member in the class.  If certain conditions are met and the settlement is effective, the Claims Administrator will send the class members a check for the settlement amount, which most likely will be very small.  Specifically, plaintiffs will receive an average recovery of only $1.34 for Lehman Brothers Structured products with a face value of $10.  Not to mention, the class action council attorney fee currently is 22% of the customer recovery ($26.3 million) plus up to $1 million in additional expenses.

            Eccleston Law Offices can assist investors and their financial advisers weigh each option and determine the best course of action under the particular circumstances.

Related Attorneys: James J. Eccleston


Return to Archive



I just received this letter from the CFP Board. Thank you, Thank you, THANK YOU!

David Y


January 21, 2022
CFP Board Establishes New Appeals Commission

The Certified Financial Planner (CFP) Board of Standards has established a new Appeals Commission. As the name suggests, the Appeals Commission possesses the sole authority to adjudicate appeal hearings.

January 20, 2022
Edward Jones Fails To Convince Supreme Court To Review Federal Preemption of Account Fee Suit

Edward Jones & Co. failed to convince the U.S. Supreme Court to analyze how a federal securities law impacts a client dispute pertaining to fee-based accounts.

January 19, 2022
SEC Charges Texas Entities Over Oil and Gas Fraud

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has charged The Heartland Group Ventures, Heartland Production and Recovery, six other Heartland-affiliated entities, four Heartland-affiliated individuals as well as several oil and gas operators.