IRS Clarifies Theft Loss Deductions for Scam Victims Amid Rising Fraud Risks

Posted on May 20th, 2025 at 4:10 PM
IRS Clarifies Theft Loss Deductions for Scam Victims Amid Rising Fraud Risks

From the Desk of Jim Eccleston at Eccleston Law

The IRS has issued new guidance clarifying when victims of financial scams can claim theft loss deductions on their taxes. According to Financial Planning, the guidance offers much-needed direction amid increasingly sophisticated fraud schemes targeting consumers.

In a memo from the IRS Office of Chief Counsel, the agency confirmed that victims may generally deduct the tax basis of their losses in the year they discover the theft, provided the motive behind moving their funds was for investment purposes. As reported by Financial Planning, this clarification resolves longstanding uncertainty over whether such transactions qualify as “entered into for profit” or are merely personal casualty losses, which the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act restricted to federally declared disaster areas.

The IRS memo presented five common scam scenarios, including compromised accounts, phishing schemes, and so-called “pig butchering” scams. It determined that victims in these cases could deduct their tax basis, typically their initial investment, excluding any unrealized gains provided they intended to protect or reinvest their funds. Conversely, victims of romance scams and kidnapping scams do not qualify, as these losses lack a profit motive and instead fall under disallowed personal casualty losses.

Further, the memo reaffirmed that early withdrawals from individual retirement accounts (IRAs) used in fraudulent transactions remain subject to standard penalties. It also distinguished these scams from Ponzi schemes, which carry unique tax deduction rules if certain criminal charges and operational criteria are met. Financial Planning reports that none of the examples in the memo qualified under the Ponzi scheme framework.

The memo’s limitations did not go unnoticed. National Taxpayer Advocate Erin Collins welcomed the IRS’ clarification but pointed out remaining gaps in taxpayer protections. According to Financial Planning, Collins urged lawmakers to lift restrictions on theft loss deductions, extend the statute of limitations for refund claims, waive early withdrawal penalties for scam victims, and permit taxpayers to amend prior returns for losses sustained.

While these proposals face uncertain prospects in Congress, especially with the pending review of 2017 tax law provisions, the memo still marks a crucial step toward clearer, fairer tax treatment for scam victims. Tax advisors and financial professionals now have firmer footing to help clients manage losses and implement fraud prevention strategies in a digital environment where financial deception has become alarmingly routine.

Eccleston Law LLC represents investors and financial advisors nationwide in securities, employment, transition, regulatory, and disciplinary matters.

Tags: Eccleston, Eccleston Law

Return to Archive

TESTIMONIALS

Previous
Next

Jim, Stephany and the whole team were a God send.  We felt like we were put into a situation where we had no advocate. Jim’s team came in with a strong, well laid out strategy on how to get our story heard. Where our outside compliance company had no ability to help, our Broker Dealer was impenitent, and the regulators were aggressive pursuing vague rules, Jim came like a barricade against an assault we did not understand. Though you pay member dues to be affiliated with FINRA and a B/D, you have no voice. The only thing that is truly heard in this un-level playing field is a bulldog’s bark like Jim’s. I would encourage anyone to call Jim and his team to find a real ally in the tough and complicated world of securities regulation. They are truly the best.

Greg P.

LATEST NEWS AND ARTICLES

March 4, 2026
Modern Fraud Schemes Escalate in Scale and Sophistication

A recent panel discussion at the Financial Services Institute OneVoice conference in San Diego highlighted how rapidly evolving fraud schemes continue to victimize both retail and wealthy investors.

March 3, 2026
FINRA Suspends Former Stifel Broker Over Costly Account Switching Trades

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) suspended a former Stifel, Nicolaus & Co.

March 2, 2026
FINRA Suspends Cetera Broker for Accepting $50,000 Client Bequest Without Firm Approval

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) imposed a $10,000 fine and a seven-month suspension on an independent broker for accepting a $50,000 bequest from a client without obtaining prior firm approval.