Hightower Drops Claims Against Former Advisor Amid Non-Compete Dispute

Posted on November 20th, 2024 at 3:58 PM
Hightower Drops Claims Against Former Advisor Amid Non-Compete Dispute

Hightower, a Chicago-based RIA firm, recently dropped its lawsuit against former advisor Lars Knudsen just days before a federal judge in Illinois was set to rule on the firm’s injunction request. According to WealthManagement, Hightower sued Knudsen in March, alleging that Knudsen violated non-compete agreements following his termination. The firm claimed his dismissal was due to policy breaches, including allegedly bringing a firearm into the office. Knudsen countersued in Washington, accusing Hightower of coercing advisors into restrictive contracts and misrepresenting his professional conduct.

Knudsen, who led Triad Wealth Management before joining Hightower in 2014, argued that the firm pushed him out to secure his clients’ assets, fostering what he described as a “toxic corporate culture.” He contended that the company’s leadership and recently added advisors sought to reshape the culture of his Belleview office, pressuring him to retire and allegedly making derogatory remarks to clients to facilitate his exit. Knudsen's attorney characterized Hightower's actions as a “disinformation campaign” against him.

Hightower, however, asserted that Knudsen misappropriated firm earnings and directed over $225,000 in client fees for personal use. The firm also alleged that Knudsen repeatedly brought a loaded firearm into the office, once placing it on the table during a termination meeting with an employee. Knudsen refuted these allegations, stating that he accidentally brought his firearm to the office once, immediately returned it to his vehicle upon realizing the mistake.

While Hightower has withdrawn its Illinois claims, the firm continues to pursue its case against Knudsen through binding arbitration. Meanwhile, Knudsen has filed a separate lawsuit against four Hightower Bellevue principals, alleging that they diverted firm funds to deny him owed compensation. Hightower has refrained from commenting on the ongoing litigation, stating only that it intends to continue pursuing its claims in arbitration.

 

Eccleston Law LLC represents investors and financial advisors nationwide in securities, employment, transition, regulatory and disciplinary matters.

Tags: eccleston, eccleston law

Return to Archive

TESTIMONIALS

Previous
Next

If the regulators are after you, and are trying to make a case against you, and you are going to contest their allegations against you, make sure you have the best securities industry defense lawyers, Eccleston Law Firm. My case was spun into a combination of penalties including fines, cash settlements, CE courses and suspension. They were the best I have seen in action. When all was said and done, they had done their magic, my situation was negotiated and settled with a simple "letter of caution" and a case closed without action. It is the most important legal business decision you will ever make, make it Eccleston Law.

Rick R.

LATEST NEWS AND ARTICLES

November 7, 2025
FINRA Suspends Former Wells Fargo Broker Over Unapproved Real Estate Venture

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) suspended former Wells Fargo broker George J. Cairnes for four months and fined him $25,000 for engaging in unapproved real estate outside business activity, according to a settlement letter issued.

November 6, 2025
Former Ameriprise Broker Ordered to Pay $2.2 Million for Elder Exploitation

A Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) arbitration panel has ordered Eric A. Dupre to pay nearly $2.2 million in damages to his former firm and two customers following allegations of theft and elder exploitation.

November 5, 2025
Former Wells Fargo Representative Suspended for Unauthorized Texting and Obstruction

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has suspended former Wells Fargo representative Eyan M. Townsend for one year and fined him $10,000 for using personal text messages to conduct business and attempting to obstruct an internal investigation by deleting those communications.