Tr?id=566623520170033&ev=PageView&noscript=1

Hightower Drops Claims Against Former Advisor Amid Non-Compete Dispute

Posted on November 20th, 2024 at 3:58 PM
Hightower Drops Claims Against Former Advisor Amid Non-Compete Dispute

Hightower, a Chicago-based RIA firm, recently dropped its lawsuit against former advisor Lars Knudsen just days before a federal judge in Illinois was set to rule on the firm’s injunction request. According to WealthManagement, Hightower sued Knudsen in March, alleging that Knudsen violated non-compete agreements following his termination. The firm claimed his dismissal was due to policy breaches, including allegedly bringing a firearm into the office. Knudsen countersued in Washington, accusing Hightower of coercing advisors into restrictive contracts and misrepresenting his professional conduct.

Knudsen, who led Triad Wealth Management before joining Hightower in 2014, argued that the firm pushed him out to secure his clients’ assets, fostering what he described as a “toxic corporate culture.” He contended that the company’s leadership and recently added advisors sought to reshape the culture of his Belleview office, pressuring him to retire and allegedly making derogatory remarks to clients to facilitate his exit. Knudsen's attorney characterized Hightower's actions as a “disinformation campaign” against him.

Hightower, however, asserted that Knudsen misappropriated firm earnings and directed over $225,000 in client fees for personal use. The firm also alleged that Knudsen repeatedly brought a loaded firearm into the office, once placing it on the table during a termination meeting with an employee. Knudsen refuted these allegations, stating that he accidentally brought his firearm to the office once, immediately returned it to his vehicle upon realizing the mistake.

While Hightower has withdrawn its Illinois claims, the firm continues to pursue its case against Knudsen through binding arbitration. Meanwhile, Knudsen has filed a separate lawsuit against four Hightower Bellevue principals, alleging that they diverted firm funds to deny him owed compensation. Hightower has refrained from commenting on the ongoing litigation, stating only that it intends to continue pursuing its claims in arbitration.

 

Eccleston Law LLC represents investors and financial advisors nationwide in securities, employment, transition, regulatory and disciplinary matters.

Tags: eccleston, eccleston law

Return to Archive

TESTIMONIALS

Previous
Next
Quotes Bigger

If the regulators are after you, and are trying to make a case against you, and you are going to contest their allegations against you, make sure you have the best securities industry defense lawyers, Eccleston Law Firm. My case was spun into a combination of penalties including fines, cash settlements, CE courses and suspension. They were the best I have seen in action. When all was said and done, they had done their magic, my situation was negotiated and settled with a simple "letter of caution" and a case closed without action. It is the most important legal business decision you will ever make, make it Eccleston Law.

Rick R.

LATEST NEWS AND ARTICLES

1779216500 Law
May 19, 2026
SEC Fines Ally Invest Advisors Over Undisclosed Robo-Advisor Conflict

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) imposed a $500,000 penalty on Ally Invest Advisors after finding that the firm failed to disclose a material conflict of interest tied to its Cash-Enhanced robo-advisor accounts.

1779206639 Law
May 19, 2026
Federal Court Upholds FINRA's Authority in Alpine Securities Challenge

A federal court has rejected a broad constitutional challenge to the authority of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), delivering a significant victory for the self-regulator and reinforcing its enforcement framework.

1778997041 1772158975 1744208044 521862 Chicago Skyline Reimagined
May 15, 2026
FINRA Suspends Former Merrill Broker for Misrepresentations in Proof of Funds Letters

FINRA has disciplined a former Merrill Lynch representative after determining that he issued inaccurate and misleading statements about a client’s financial ability to complete a home purchase.