Former Wells Fargo Advisors Team Wins Sweeping Expungement of Their Forms U-5

Posted on January 22nd, 2020 at 4:09 PM
Former Wells Fargo Advisors Team Wins Sweeping Expungement of Their Forms U-5

From the Desk of Jim Eccleston at Eccleston Law LLC:

On January 15th, a FINRA arbitration panel in Indianapolis recommended expungement of Forms U-5, finding that Wells Fargo Advisors Financial Network (“Wells Fargo”) had disaffiliated with a team of financial advisors “as a result of fabricated investigatory findings.”

The new disclosure language also will appear on the publicly-available BrokerCheck reports and the CRD database system.

The originally-filed Forms U-5 reported that the three individuals were “permitted to resign” from Wells Fargo in 2017. Their termination notices (Forms U-5) were filed with FINRA, and read, “Termination of licensee agreement after a review of certain annuity processes. Specifically the processes of submission and funding of client annuity replacement contracts.”  In addition, certain disclosure questions were checked “Yes”, which indicated that the team had “violated investment related statutes, regulations, rules or industry standards of conduct.”

The team thereafter joined Ameriprise Financial Services. The team filed arbitration claims against Wells Fargo. The arbitration was resolved to the mutual satisfaction of the parties. The team thereafter pressed on with the expungement portion of their legal action.

After hearing evidence and in a unanimous award, the FINRA arbitration panel found that Wells Fargo had disaffiliated with the financial advisors “as a result of fabricated investigatory findings.”

In the FINRA arbitration award, the panel of arbitrators recommends expungement. Specifically, the panel recommends that the reason for termination be changed to “Voluntary” and the termination explanation be changed to reflect that the disaffiliation was a result of fabricated investigatory findings. Additionally, the panel recommends expungement of the “Yes” answer to Questions 7(F)(1) of the Forms U-5 filed by Wells Fargo and maintained by the CRD. The “Yes” answer shall be changed to “No” and the accompanying Termination Disclosure Reporting Page shall be deleted in its entirety.

The Panel further recommends expungement of the “Yes” answer to Question

14(J)(1) of the Amended Forms U-4 filed by Ameriprise Financial Services, Inc., and maintained by the CRD. The “Yes” answer shall be changed to “No” and the accompanying Termination Disclosure Reporting Page shall be deleted in its entirety.

Finally, the panel states that these recommendations shall apply to any subsequent disclosures concerning these events.

The attorneys of Eccleston Law LLC represent investors and advisors nationwide in securities and employment matters. The securities lawyers at Eccleston Law also practice a variety of other areas of practice for financial investors and advisors including Securities FraudCompliance ProtectionBreach of Fiduciary DutyFINRA Matters, and much more. Our attorneys draw on a combined experience of nearly 65 years in delivering the highest quality legal services. If you are in need of legal services, contact us to schedule a one-on-one consultation today.

Related Attorneys: James J. Eccleston

Tags: james eccleston, eccleston law, eccleston law llc, eccleston, wells fargo, forms u5, brokercheck

Return to Archive

TESTIMONIALS

Previous
Next

You were most helpful with my FINRA deposition. You are a good lawyer and a good person.

Dan B.

LATEST NEWS AND ARTICLES

April 25, 2024
B. Riley Financial Clears Air Amid Allegations, Stock Surges

Amidst swirling speculation regarding its connections with a client linked to the Prophecy Asset Management collapse, B. Riley Financial Inc. has conducted an internal
review, concluding no affiliations with the defunct hedge fund.

April 24, 2024
RIA Insurance Claims Skyrocket

A recent analysis by Golsan Scruggs reveals a staggering 231 percent increase in errors-and-omissions (E&O) liability claims among registered investment advisor (RIA)
insurers.

April 23, 2024
Surge Predicted in Regulation Best Interest Cases

According to a recent analysis, Reg BI-related actions quickly have ascended to the top five issues for FINRA, with fines totaling $6 million in 2023.