Tr?id=566623520170033&ev=PageView&noscript=1

FINRA Reintroduces Expungement Proposal After Substantial Pushback

Posted on May 11th, 2022 at 1:29 PM
FINRA Reintroduces Expungement Proposal After Substantial Pushback

From the Desk of Jim Eccleston at Eccleston Law:

After the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) withdrew a broker expungement proposal, the regulator has reversed course and now is recommending a “two-track approach”, which approach will include the Securities and Exchange Commission’s processes to adopt the rule. 

The previously withdrawn proposal would have designated a roster of arbitrators selected at random to adjudicate cases filed by advisors seeking expungement of client complaints. While the North American Securities Administrators Association (NASAA) and the Public Investors Advocate Bar Association (PIABA) commended some aspects of the proposal, their concerns prompted FINRA to “temporarily” withdraw the proposal last May. “FINRA’s Board of Governors continues to consider further changes to enhance the Special Roster Proposal. FINRA continues to believe it is important to pursue a two-track approach to improving the expungement process,” according to the regulator’s April 2022 discussion paper. FINRA CEO Robert Cook has additionally committed to work with the SEC, NASAA and other stakeholders to improve the rule.

According to FINRA, there were 5,365 cases resulting in customer arbitration awards between January 2016 and December 2021, and at least 4,500, or 84%, approved expungement requests by advisors. Critics of the current system view that rate as too high. Likewise, PIABA and NASAA believe expungement cases should be a more “adversarial” proceeding with more substantial involvement from the clients who filed the complaints. Some observe that the current process is similar to filing an unopposed motion in court because advisors file the case against their firms, which may or may not contest the filing. And while clients receive notice of the proceeding in the mail, they rarely testify or become involved in the matter.

Eccleston Law LLC represents investors and financial advisors nationwide in securities, employment, regulatory and disciplinary matters.

 
 
 

Tags:

Return to Archive

TESTIMONIALS

Previous
Next
Quotes Bigger

Jim, Stephany and the whole team were a God send.  We felt like we were put into a situation where we had no advocate. Jim’s team came in with a strong, well laid out strategy on how to get our story heard. Where our outside compliance company had no ability to help, our Broker Dealer was impenitent, and the regulators were aggressive pursuing vague rules, Jim came like a barricade against an assault we did not understand. Though you pay member dues to be affiliated with FINRA and a B/D, you have no voice. The only thing that is truly heard in this un-level playing field is a bulldog’s bark like Jim’s. I would encourage anyone to call Jim and his team to find a real ally in the tough and complicated world of securities regulation. They are truly the best.

Greg P.

LATEST NEWS AND ARTICLES

1775574785 Law
April 7, 2026
SEC Charges Long Island RIA and Executives in $138 Million Private Fund Scheme

A Long Island-based registered investment adviser and two of its senior executives now face parallel civil and criminal proceedings tied to an alleged scheme involving conflicted private fund investments, as reported by InvestmentNews.

1775496481 Law
April 6, 2026
FINRA Arbitration Panel Orders Fidelity to Pay $1.3 Million Over Structured Product Disputes

A Financial Industry Regulatory (FINRA) arbitration panel has ordered Fidelity Brokerage Services to pay approximately $1.3 million to two groups of clients who alleged misconduct tied to structured product investments, according to ThinkAdvisor.

1775253477 Law
April 3, 2026
FINRA Enforcement Trends Show Higher Monetary Sanctions Despite Fewer Cases in 2025

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) increased total monetary sanctions in 2025, even as the number of enforcement actions declined.