FINRA Proposes Rule Governing Registered Reps Holding Positions of Trust

Posted on July 31st, 2020 at 9:12 AM
FINRA Proposes Rule Governing Registered Reps Holding Positions of Trust

From the Desk of Jim Eccleston at Eccleston Law LLC:

FINRA has proposed a rule change which would limit a registered person’s ability to be named as a customer’s beneficiary or hold a position of trust for a customer. The new rule would be known as FINRA Rule 3241.

According to FINRA, registered persons face potential conflicts of interest when they are named a customer’s beneficiary, executor, trustee or power of attorney. FINRA was especially concerned about harm to senior investors arising out of such a situation.  FINRA noted that many firms have internal policies that prohibit registered representatives from holding such positions of trust with a customer, but FINRA felt that it needed to adopt its own rule.  

By creating FINRA Rule 3241, FINRA is seeking “to create a uniform, national standard to govern registered persons holding positions of trust.” Under the proposed rule, a registered rep. would be required to decline being named a beneficiary of a customer estate, an executor, trustee, or holding a power of attorney unless the registered rep. provides written notice to their firm and receives written approval.  The rule would not apply when the customer is an immediate family member of the registered rep.

The attorneys of Eccleston Law LLC represent investors and advisors nationwide in securities and employment matters. The securities lawyers at Eccleston Law also practice a variety of other areas of practice for financial investors and advisors including Securities FraudCompliance ProtectionBreach of Fiduciary DutyFINRA Matters, and much more. Our attorneys draw on a combined experience of nearly 65 years in delivering the highest quality legal services. If you are in need of legal services, contact us to schedule a one-on-one consultation today.

Related Attorneys: James J. Eccleston

Tags: james eccleston, eccleston law, finra, finra rule 3241, conflicts of interest

Return to Archive

TESTIMONIALS

Previous
Next

Jim, Stephany and the whole team were a God send.  We felt like we were put into a situation where we had no advocate. Jim’s team came in with a strong, well laid out strategy on how to get our story heard. Where our outside compliance company had no ability to help, our Broker Dealer was impenitent, and the regulators were aggressive pursuing vague rules, Jim came like a barricade against an assault we did not understand. Though you pay member dues to be affiliated with FINRA and a B/D, you have no voice. The only thing that is truly heard in this un-level playing field is a bulldog’s bark like Jim’s. I would encourage anyone to call Jim and his team to find a real ally in the tough and complicated world of securities regulation. They are truly the best.

Greg P.

LATEST NEWS AND ARTICLES

October 2, 2024
SEC Charges Two South Florida Men for Defrauding Venezuelan-American Investors in $5 Million Scheme

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has filed a complaint against two South Florida men, Francisco Javier Malave Hernandez and Ricardo Javier Guerra Farias, for orchestrating a multi-million dollar investment fraud that targeted members of the Venezuelan-American community.

October 1, 2024
California Advisor Suspended and Fined for Churning Client Accounts

A veteran advisor in Santa Maria, California, Stewart "Paxton" Ginn, has been suspended for 18 months and fined $50,000 by FINRA, according to AdvisorHub

September 30, 2024
Bank of America and Merrill Lynch Settle with FINRA for Supervisory Failures

Bank of America and its subsidiary, Merrill Lynch, have agreed to a $3 million fine and censure as part of a settlement with FINRA over long-term supervisory failures.