Tr?id=566623520170033&ev=PageView&noscript=1

FINRA Bans Former Raymond James Advisor for Attempting to Deceive Investigators

Posted on August 16th, 2023 at 4:02 PM
FINRA Bans Former Raymond James Advisor for Attempting to Deceive Investigators

From the desk of Jim Eccleston at Eccleston Law 

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has barred a former Raymond James advisor. Timothy J. Breslin was found to have submitted altered checks and manipulated bank statements to FINRA Enforcement staff. According to a letter of settlement, known as an Acceptance, Waiver and Consent (“AWC”), Breslin's actions took place between December 2022 and June 2023 during an investigation into allegations of improper automated clearing house transfers.

The investigation originated from a Form U-5 employment termination notice filed by Raymond James, issued in September 2022, which disclosed Breslin's firing due to initiating unfunded ACH transfers from an unrelated financial institution to his personal bank account. According to AdvisorHub, Raymond James noted Breslin's lack of honesty regarding the incident.

In December, Breslin informed FINRA that he had taken a trip with his brother and a friend. He claimed they had given him two $5,000 checks to reimburse him for travel expenses, but these checks unexpectedly bounced. However, FINRA determined that he had not received or deposited any $5,000 check from his brother or friend during the relevant period. In January, when FINRA followed up, Breslin reiterated his claims. He even submitted altered copies of the checks, changing their dates and amounts. He also provided a fabricated version of his bank account statement indicating the checks had been deposited. Strangely, his account balance remained unchanged, revealing the deception.

Breslin presented another falsified account statement in June testimony to FINRA Enforcement staff. At this deposition, known as an On The Record (“OTR”) the account statement displayed a running balance that seemed to align with the purported deposit of the $5,000 checks. This series of actions led to the settlement, where Breslin was found to have engaged in deceptive practices. Breslin violated FINRA Rule 8210, which mandates advisors provide accurate testimony in response to its investigations, and FINRA Rule 2010, requiring “high standards of commercial honor.”

 

Eccleston Law LLC represents investors and financial advisors nationwide in securities, employment, transition, regulatory, and disciplinary matters.

Tags: eccleston, eccleston law

Return to Archive

TESTIMONIALS

Previous
Next
Quotes Bigger

Thank You from the bottom of our hearts for all you have done for us. When we realized this was a very bad investment - we did not know where to turn for help. Then we received your name. When we called you - you were so kind to us and then agreed to help us. For this we are so very grateful. The world would be a much nicer place if there were more people like the two of you in it. We will always remember all the help and kindness you have shown us. Thank you so very very much for everything.

Wayne and Judy S.

LATEST NEWS AND ARTICLES

1779287606 Law
May 20, 2026
FINRA Sanctions Ameriprise for Supervisory Failures in Variable Annuity Exchanges

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has fined Ameriprise Financial Services and ordered restitution to resolve allegations that the firm failed to adequately supervise certain variable annuity exchange recommendations.

1779216500 Law
May 19, 2026
SEC Fines Ally Invest Advisors Over Undisclosed Robo-Advisor Conflict

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) imposed a $500,000 penalty on Ally Invest Advisors after finding that the firm failed to disclose a material conflict of interest tied to its Cash-Enhanced robo-advisor accounts.

1779206639 Law
May 19, 2026
Federal Court Upholds FINRA's Authority in Alpine Securities Challenge

A federal court has rejected a broad constitutional challenge to the authority of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), delivering a significant victory for the self-regulator and reinforcing its enforcement framework.