FINRA and SEC Officials Reveal Common Pitfalls in Reg BI Exam Sweeps

Posted on May 31st, 2022 at 8:50 AM
FINRA and SEC Officials Reveal Common Pitfalls in Reg BI Exam Sweeps

From the Desk of Jim Eccleston at Eccleston Law:

Regulators have announced their intention to increase the frequency of examinations as they continue to discover spotty compliance even after Regulation Best Interest (“Reg. BI”) became effective two years ago. 

Recent examinations have exposed “overly generic” firm policies with other firms “sort of just telling advisors what the rule requirements are”, according to Nicole McCafferty, senior director of the FINRA National Cause and Financial Crimes Detection Programs. According to McCafferty, some firms continue to struggle with adhering to Reg BI, which requires firms to show they are making recommendations to retail clients with “reasonable diligence, care, and skill”. Additionally, numerous firms are relying on the premise that their clients are “high net worth” or “speculative”, which sits outside of Reg BI’s intended scope. 

Reg BI became effective in June 2020, and it restricted advisors from putting their own interests ahead of the interests of their clients. The SEC also plans to release three more Reg BI bulletins that further outline the regulator’s ambition to reduce conflicts of interests and emphasize the importance of considering reasonably available investment alternatives for clients, according to a recent statement by SEC Chairman Gary Gensler. 

Eccleston Law LLC represents investors and financial advisors nationwide in securities, employment, regulatory and disciplinary matters.

 
 

Tags: eccleston law, sec, finra

Return to Archive

TESTIMONIALS

Previous
Next

Thank you for your professional assistance with this matter. You are very good at what you do.

John T.

LATEST NEWS AND ARTICLES

February 3, 2026
FINRA Accuses Spartan Capital of Widespread Churning That Allegedly Harmed Customers

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has brought a disciplinary complaint against Spartan Capital Securities and several senior leaders of the New York City–based broker-dealer, alleging that the firm facilitated excessive trading that generated millions of dollars in revenue while causing substantial losses to customers.

February 2, 2026
California Investors Allege Unsuitable DST Recommendations in FINRA Arbitration

Two investors from the San Francisco Bay Area have filed a FINRA arbitration claim against brokerage firm Realized Financial and its financial advisors.

January 30, 2026
FINRA Arbitration Panel Orders J.P. Morgan to Amend Form U-5, Flags Potential Pattern of Conduct

A Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) arbitration panel recently issued an unusually detailed decision in a dispute between J.P. Morgan Securities and former advisor Joshua David Sappi Biering, shedding rare light on how a firm may deploy - and sometimes abuse - the Form U-5 during advisor departures.