Federal Judge Strikes Down Hightower's Non-Compete Agreement in California

Posted on March 4th, 2025 at 10:51 AM
Federal Judge Strikes Down Hightower's Non-Compete Agreement in California

From the desk of Jim Eccleston at Eccleston Law

A federal judge in Wilmington, Delaware, ruled against Hightower Advisors in its effort to enforce non-compete agreements against a former advisor in California who sold his firm to Hightower.

AdvisorHub reports that District Court Judge Richard G. Andrews barred Hightower from preventing Darren Reinig from operating a competing advisory firm. The judge found that California law invalidates non-compete agreements, undermining Hightower’s attempt to block Reinig from soliciting former clients. Reinig, who sold his practice to Hightower in 2019, launched a new advisory firm in February 2023.

However, Reinig’s legal battle is not over. Judge Andrews left the door open for Hightower to pursue claims for misappropriation of trade secrets.

According to AdvisorHub, Hightower argued that its non-compete provisions were enforceable under California law, which allows restrictions when a business has been sold. However, Judge Andrews determined that barring Reinig from working in investment advisory services nationwide was overly broad and unenforceable.

A Hightower spokesperson stated that the firm is evaluating its next steps and will continue arbitration proceedings, where it seeks a permanent injunction and damages.

 

 

Eccleston Law LLC represents investors and financial advisors nationwide in securities, employment, transition, regulatory, and disciplinary matters.

Tags: eccleston, eccleston law

Return to Archive

TESTIMONIALS

Previous
Next

Thank you so very much for your guidance, patience, and expertise.

Beth and Steve K.

LATEST NEWS AND ARTICLES

September 15, 2025
California Young-Gun Investor Charged in Alleged $6 Million Ponzi Scheme

Federal prosecutors have accused Mihir Deepak Sukthankar, a California resident once celebrated as a teenage trading “prodigy,” of orchestrating a multi-million-dollar Ponzi scheme.

September 12, 2025
LPL Broker Fined and Suspended for Recommending Risky Investments to Elderly Client

An LPL Financial broker in Elizabethtown, Kentucky, has agreed to sanctions after FINRA found he violated Regulation Best Interest (Reg BI) when recommending unsuitable investments to an elderly customer.

 

September 11, 2025
Montana Federal Judge Allows Family's Premium Financing Claims to Proceed

A federal judge in Montana has allowed a family to move forward with negligence, fraud, and unjust enrichment claims tied to a premium-financed life insurance arrangement valued at $67.5 million.