Federal Judge Strikes Down Hightower's Non-Compete Agreement in California

Posted on March 4th, 2025 at 10:51 AM
Federal Judge Strikes Down Hightower's Non-Compete Agreement in California

From the desk of Jim Eccleston at Eccleston Law

A federal judge in Wilmington, Delaware, ruled against Hightower Advisors in its effort to enforce non-compete agreements against a former advisor in California who sold his firm to Hightower.

AdvisorHub reports that District Court Judge Richard G. Andrews barred Hightower from preventing Darren Reinig from operating a competing advisory firm. The judge found that California law invalidates non-compete agreements, undermining Hightower’s attempt to block Reinig from soliciting former clients. Reinig, who sold his practice to Hightower in 2019, launched a new advisory firm in February 2023.

However, Reinig’s legal battle is not over. Judge Andrews left the door open for Hightower to pursue claims for misappropriation of trade secrets.

According to AdvisorHub, Hightower argued that its non-compete provisions were enforceable under California law, which allows restrictions when a business has been sold. However, Judge Andrews determined that barring Reinig from working in investment advisory services nationwide was overly broad and unenforceable.

A Hightower spokesperson stated that the firm is evaluating its next steps and will continue arbitration proceedings, where it seeks a permanent injunction and damages.

 

 

Eccleston Law LLC represents investors and financial advisors nationwide in securities, employment, transition, regulatory, and disciplinary matters.

Tags: eccleston, eccleston law

Return to Archive

TESTIMONIALS

Previous
Next

I am so blessed to have you and your dynamic team defending me. Your ethics, forward thinking and strategies are amazing.  You guys are the best group of attorneys in the country that I could hire to handle this complicated case.

Cindy C.

LATEST NEWS AND ARTICLES

February 4, 2026
Investor Redemptions Rise in Nontraded BDCs Amid Credit Concerns

Financial advisors and their clients have increased redemptions from nontraded business development companies (BDCs) following a series of high-profile corporate bankruptcies, according to InvestmentNews. The surge highlights growing investor concern about liquidity and credit exposure within these high-yield but often risky investment ...

February 3, 2026
FINRA Accuses Spartan Capital of Widespread Churning That Allegedly Harmed Customers

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has brought a disciplinary complaint against Spartan Capital Securities and several senior leaders of the New York City–based broker-dealer, alleging that the firm facilitated excessive trading that generated millions of dollars in revenue while causing substantial losses to customers.

February 2, 2026
California Investors Allege Unsuitable DST Recommendations in FINRA Arbitration

Two investors from the San Francisco Bay Area have filed a FINRA arbitration claim against brokerage firm Realized Financial and its financial advisors.