Federal Judge Strikes Down Hightower's Non-Compete Agreement in California

Posted on March 4th, 2025 at 10:51 AM
Federal Judge Strikes Down Hightower's Non-Compete Agreement in California

From the desk of Jim Eccleston at Eccleston Law

A federal judge in Wilmington, Delaware, ruled against Hightower Advisors in its effort to enforce non-compete agreements against a former advisor in California who sold his firm to Hightower.

AdvisorHub reports that District Court Judge Richard G. Andrews barred Hightower from preventing Darren Reinig from operating a competing advisory firm. The judge found that California law invalidates non-compete agreements, undermining Hightower’s attempt to block Reinig from soliciting former clients. Reinig, who sold his practice to Hightower in 2019, launched a new advisory firm in February 2023.

However, Reinig’s legal battle is not over. Judge Andrews left the door open for Hightower to pursue claims for misappropriation of trade secrets.

According to AdvisorHub, Hightower argued that its non-compete provisions were enforceable under California law, which allows restrictions when a business has been sold. However, Judge Andrews determined that barring Reinig from working in investment advisory services nationwide was overly broad and unenforceable.

A Hightower spokesperson stated that the firm is evaluating its next steps and will continue arbitration proceedings, where it seeks a permanent injunction and damages.

 

 

Eccleston Law LLC represents investors and financial advisors nationwide in securities, employment, transition, regulatory, and disciplinary matters.

Tags: eccleston, eccleston law

Return to Archive

TESTIMONIALS

Previous
Next

Jim, Stephany and the whole team were a God send.  We felt like we were put into a situation where we had no advocate. Jim’s team came in with a strong, well laid out strategy on how to get our story heard. Where our outside compliance company had no ability to help, our Broker Dealer was impenitent, and the regulators were aggressive pursuing vague rules, Jim came like a barricade against an assault we did not understand. Though you pay member dues to be affiliated with FINRA and a B/D, you have no voice. The only thing that is truly heard in this un-level playing field is a bulldog’s bark like Jim’s. I would encourage anyone to call Jim and his team to find a real ally in the tough and complicated world of securities regulation. They are truly the best.

Greg P.

LATEST NEWS AND ARTICLES

March 21, 2025
SEC Updates Marketing Rule Guidance to Clarify Extracted Performance and Portfolio Metrics

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has issued updated guidance on its marketing rule, addressing industry concerns regarding net performance requirements, extracted performance, and portfolio characteristics.

March 20, 2025
Stifel Loses Raiding Case, Ordered to Pay Over $7 Million in Legal Fees

Stifel Financial has lost its raiding and breach-of-contract claim against a group of advisors who left its Indianapolis office to establish their own firm.

March 19, 2025
FINRA Enforcement Actions in 2024: Fines Drop But Cases Increase

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) imposed $59 million in fines in 2024, reflecting a 35 percent decrease from the previous year, according to an analysis by Eversheds Sutherland.