Federal Judge Rejects Vanguard’s $40 Million Class Settlement, Citing Better Outcome Under SEC Deal

Posted on May 23rd, 2025 at 3:00 PM
Federal Judge Rejects Vanguard’s $40 Million Class Settlement, Citing Better Outcome Under SEC Deal

From the Desk of Jim Eccleston at Eccleston Law

A federal judge has rejected a proposed $40 million class-action settlement with Vanguard, finding that the deal offered little to no real value to harmed investors compared to a separate settlement the firm reached with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), according to Barron’s.

The dispute originated after corporate retirement plans moved out of Vanguard’s target-date funds in favor of lower-cost institutional options. This shift left retail investors with unexpected capital gains tax liabilities. Vanguard initially agreed to settle the resulting class action for $40 million, allocating over $13 million for plaintiffs’ attorneys’ fees. The U.S. District Court had granted preliminary approval of the settlement before new facts emerged.

Around the same time, Vanguard entered into a $135 million remediation agreement with the SEC and several state regulators for the same conduct. Notably, that agreement allowed Vanguard to reduce its SEC payment by $40 million if the court approved the class settlement. In effect, Vanguard’s total payout remained $135 million, but approval of the class settlement would divert a significant portion of the sum to attorneys’ fees, reducing the investors’ recovery.

As reported by Barron's, the court called this a “strange situation” and highlighted that rejecting the class settlement would result in a greater recovery for the investors through the SEC fund-- without deductions for legal fees and without requiring class members to waive any claims.

Following additional argument and briefing, Judge Murphy concluded that the proposed class settlement was neither fair, reasonable, nor adequate. He noted that approval would have primarily benefitted Vanguard and class counsel at the expense of the investors. By rejecting the deal, the court preserved investors' rights and guaranteed them at least the same financial recovery through the SEC agreement. 

The court has ordered the parties to file a status report by May 30.

Eccleston Law LLC represents investors and financial advisors nationwide in securities, employment, transition, regulatory, and disciplinary matters.

Tags: Eccleston, Eccleston Law

Return to Archive

TESTIMONIALS

Previous
Next

If you find yourself in trouble with the regulators, call Eccleston Law, you won't regret it.

Rick R.

LATEST NEWS AND ARTICLES

October 30, 2025
SEC Sues Former Franchise Group CEO Over $350 Million Hedge Fund Fraud

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filed a lawsuit against Brian Kahn, former CEO of Franchise Group Inc., alleging he defrauded investors of more than $350 million in a multi-year investment adviser fraud tied to the collapse of Prophecy Asset Management (Prophecy).

October 29, 2025
FINRA Foundation Study Reveals Alarming Investor Susceptibility to Fraudulent Offers

The FINRA Investor Education Foundation (FINRA Foundation) has released preliminary findings from its upcoming report, Investors in the United States: A Report of the National Financial Capability Study.

October 28, 2025
UBS Seeks Court Order Against $1.4 Billion Florida Advisory Team Over Client Solicitation Allegations

UBS Wealth Management USA has filed a lawsuit and requested a temporary restraining order (TRO) against a $1.4 billion advisory team that recently departed to join Elevation Point, a West Palm Beach-based registered investment advisor launched just 15 months ago.