Edward Jones Fails To Convince Supreme Court To Review Federal Preemption of Account Fee Suit

Posted on January 20th, 2022 at 1:12 PM
Edward Jones Fails To Convince Supreme Court To Review Federal Preemption of Account Fee Suit

From the Desk of Jim Eccleston at Eccleston Law:

Edward Jones & Co. failed to convince the U.S. Supreme Court to analyze how a federal securities law impacts a client dispute pertaining to fee-based accounts. 

Edward Jones had argued that a federal statute imposing uniform standards for securities class claims ought to prohibit a client complaint alleging breach of state-law fiduciary duties. The Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act (SLUSA) instructs federal courts to dismiss class action suits that allege misrepresentations or omissions of material facts “in connection with the purchase or sale of a covered security.” 

Congress designed the statute to prohibit class plaintiffs from disguising their claims as a state law suit in an effort to circumvent federal pleading requirements. The securities class plaintiff alleged that Edward Jones failed to conduct a “suitability analysis” prior to recommending that clients transition from commission-based to fee-based accounts. The class plaintiffs did not allege that they would have traded differently as a result of the suitability analysis, which implies that the misrepresentations were not made “in connection with” the securities transactions and SLUSA would not apply, said the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in March 2021. 

Eccleston Law LLC represents investors and financial advisors nationwide in securities, employment, regulatory and disciplinary matters.

Tags: eccleston law, edward jones, supreme court

Return to Archive

TESTIMONIALS

Previous
Next

If you find yourself in trouble with the regulators, call Eccleston Law, you won't regret it.

Rick R.

LATEST NEWS AND ARTICLES

September 5, 2025
Merrill Lynch Advisor Faces FINRA Disciplinary Action for Refusing to Cooperate with Investigation

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has initiated disciplinary proceedings against former Merrill Lynch broker Ali F. Chehab of Portland, Oregon. According to ThinkAdvisor, FINRA alleges that he refused to cooperate in an investigation into potential misconduct, including unauthorized trading and material misrepresentati...

September 4, 2025
Wells Fargo Ties $2,000 Bonus to Non-Solicitation Clause, Raising Advisor Concerns

Wells Fargo & Co. recently issued a $2,000 bank-wide award to its 215,000 employees, following the Federal Reserve’s June decision to lift its asset growth restrictions.

September 3, 2025
Kansas City Advisory Firms Agree to $25.5 Million Settlement Over No-Poach Allegations

Mariner Wealth Advisors, along with two other Kansas City-area firms, has agreed to a $25.5 million class action settlement over allegations that they illegally agreed not to solicit each other’s advisors.