DOL Clarifies BICE Exemption Under New Rule

Posted on July 26th, 2016 at 3:16 PM
DOL Clarifies BICE Exemption Under New Rule

From the Desk of Jim Eccleston at Eccleston Law LLC:

Recently the DOL posted a list of technical corrections, one of which deleted six words, creating confusion about the use of best-interest contract exemption (BICE). The DOL now has clarified that the new wording makes it possible for insurance firms to qualify for an exemption from a regulation that increases investment advice standards for retirement accounts.

The changes created confusion about whether insurance firms could use the so-called BICE. According to the provision, financial advisers are given some freedom to choose how they charge for their services provided that they sign a legally binding contract that requires them to act in the best interest of their clients.

The language in the final draft of the provision, released in April, stated that an insurance firm was a financial institution as long as the state required an annual audit “by an independent firm of actuaries.” This proved to be a point of confusion because many states do not actually require insurers to be audited by and independent firm of actuaries. Because of this some state’s insurers were technically not allowed to use the best-interest contract exemption, even though that was one of the goals of the provision in the first place.

One DOL official said, “Our intent was to enable insurance companies to use the exemption … None of this should make a difference to anyone in operation in the sense that it’s all what we intended.” By “this” he refers to the removal of the language, as it will have no effect on the actual implementation or compliance with the rule. 

The attorneys of Eccleston Law LLC represent investors and advisers nationwide in securities and employment matters. Our attorneys draw on a combined experience of nearly 65 years in delivering the highest quality legal services. If you are in need of legal services, contact us to schedule a one-on-one consultation today.

Related Attorneys: James J. Eccleston

Tags: Eccleston, Eccleston Law, Eccleston Law LLC, James Eccleston

Return to Archive



If the regulators are after you, and are trying to make a case against you, and you are going to contest their allegations against you, make sure you have the best securities industry defense lawyers, Eccleston Law Firm. My case was spun into a combination of penalties including fines, cash settlements, CE courses and suspension. They were the best I have seen in action. When all was said and done, they had done their magic, my situation was negotiated and settled with a simple "letter of caution" and a case closed without action. It is the most important legal business decision you will ever make, make it Eccleston Law.

Rick R.


January 21, 2022
CFP Board Establishes New Appeals Commission

The Certified Financial Planner (CFP) Board of Standards has established a new Appeals Commission. As the name suggests, the Appeals Commission possesses the sole authority to adjudicate appeal hearings.

January 20, 2022
Edward Jones Fails To Convince Supreme Court To Review Federal Preemption of Account Fee Suit

Edward Jones & Co. failed to convince the U.S. Supreme Court to analyze how a federal securities law impacts a client dispute pertaining to fee-based accounts.

January 19, 2022
SEC Charges Texas Entities Over Oil and Gas Fraud

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has charged The Heartland Group Ventures, Heartland Production and Recovery, six other Heartland-affiliated entities, four Heartland-affiliated individuals as well as several oil and gas operators.