Congress Considers Expanding the Accredited Investor Definition

Posted on March 13th, 2025 at 2:30 PM
Congress Considers Expanding the Accredited Investor Definition

From the desk of Jim Eccleston at Eccleston Law

A recent congressional hearing examined potential reforms to the accredited investor definition, a critical threshold determining who can participate in private market investments. According to the DI Wire, the U.S. House Financial Services Subcommittee on Capital Markets convened to discuss the Accredited Investor Definition Review Act, sponsored by Congressman Bill Huizenga (R-Mich.). Lawmakers debated whether the current wealth and income requirements should be expanded to include additional qualification pathways.

Under Rule 501 of Regulation D of the Securities Act of 1933, individuals qualify as accredited investors if they meet one of two financial thresholds:

  • A net worth exceeding $1 million, excluding the primary residence, either individually or jointly with a spouse
  • An annual income exceeding $200,000 in each of the two most recent years (or joint income with a spouse exceeding $300,000) with a reasonable expectation of maintaining the same income level

The SEC last amended the definition in August 2020, expanding eligibility to include:

  • Individuals holding specific professional certifications
  • “Knowledgeable employees” of private funds, but only for investments in that fund
  • SEC-registered and state-registered investment advisers
  • “Family clients” of a “family office” meeting certain criteria
  • Directors, executive officers, and general partners of an issuer or its general partner

The subcommittee is now seeking public feedback on whether the accredited investor definition should move beyond wealth and income thresholds to consider factors such as education, geography, or other qualifications. The deadline for public comment is March 31, 2025, according to the DI Wire.

 

Eccleston Law LLC represents investors and financial advisors nationwide in securities, employment, transition, regulatory, and disciplinary matters.

Tags: eccleston, eccleston law

Return to Archive

TESTIMONIALS

Previous
Next

I just wanted to say thanks again for preparing and executing my case in such a professional manner. It was a pleasure to watch two professionals take such pride in their work, as well as becoming personally in tune with your client (Me). I would personally recommend you and your firm to anyone.

John O.

LATEST NEWS AND ARTICLES

November 21, 2025
FINRA Fines Independent Financial Group for Allowing Suspended Broker to Place Trades

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) issued a censure and $100,000 fine against Independent Financial Group (IFG) after finding that the IFG allowed a suspended and statutorily disqualified broker to continue placing trades.

November 20, 2025
Supreme Alliance Fined for Failure to Supervise Variable Annuity Sales

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has fined Supreme Alliance $80,000 for failing to supervise recommendations and exchanges involving deferred variable annuities, as well as for failing to document background checks for newly hired registered representatives.

November 19, 2025
Lawsuit Accuses Inspired Healthcare Capital of Concealing Insolvency

According to news sources, a new lawsuit alleges that Inspired Healthcare Capital (IHC) and its CEO, Luke Lee, misrepresented the company’s financial health and concealed insolvency from a lender who extended a $1.5 million loan in late 2024.