Congress Considers Expanding the Accredited Investor Definition

Posted on March 13th, 2025 at 2:30 PM
Congress Considers Expanding the Accredited Investor Definition

From the desk of Jim Eccleston at Eccleston Law

A recent congressional hearing examined potential reforms to the accredited investor definition, a critical threshold determining who can participate in private market investments. According to the DI Wire, the U.S. House Financial Services Subcommittee on Capital Markets convened to discuss the Accredited Investor Definition Review Act, sponsored by Congressman Bill Huizenga (R-Mich.). Lawmakers debated whether the current wealth and income requirements should be expanded to include additional qualification pathways.

Under Rule 501 of Regulation D of the Securities Act of 1933, individuals qualify as accredited investors if they meet one of two financial thresholds:

  • A net worth exceeding $1 million, excluding the primary residence, either individually or jointly with a spouse
  • An annual income exceeding $200,000 in each of the two most recent years (or joint income with a spouse exceeding $300,000) with a reasonable expectation of maintaining the same income level

The SEC last amended the definition in August 2020, expanding eligibility to include:

  • Individuals holding specific professional certifications
  • “Knowledgeable employees” of private funds, but only for investments in that fund
  • SEC-registered and state-registered investment advisers
  • “Family clients” of a “family office” meeting certain criteria
  • Directors, executive officers, and general partners of an issuer or its general partner

The subcommittee is now seeking public feedback on whether the accredited investor definition should move beyond wealth and income thresholds to consider factors such as education, geography, or other qualifications. The deadline for public comment is March 31, 2025, according to the DI Wire.

 

Eccleston Law LLC represents investors and financial advisors nationwide in securities, employment, transition, regulatory, and disciplinary matters.

Tags: eccleston, eccleston law

Return to Archive

TESTIMONIALS

Previous
Next

I am grateful to have found an outstanding law firm that specializes in securities matters. My lawyers were extremely knowledgeable, diligent, and are skilled litigators. No stone was left upturned. As a result of their experience and tenacity, the arbitration proceeding was dismissed in my favor.

Michael E.

LATEST NEWS AND ARTICLES

February 19, 2026
Wall Street Journal Analysis Questions Investor Gains Following DuPont's Decade-Long Breakup

A Wall Street Journal analysis has raised questions about investor returns following DuPont’s multi-year corporate restructuring, which divided the historic conglomerate into multiple independent companies.

February 18, 2026
American Portfolios Ordered to Pay $4.6 Million in Restitution Over Cash Sweep Program Disclosures

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has ordered American Portfolios Financial Services to return $4.6 million to customers and pay monetary sanctions after determining that the firm overcharged investors and failed to properly disclose how it generated revenue through a cash sweep program.

February 17, 2026
FINRA Fines Kingswood Capital Partners $150,000 for Supervisory Failures in GWG L Bond Sales

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) censured and fined San Diego–based broker-dealer Kingswood Capital Partners $150,000 after finding supervisory failures tied to sales of high-risk GWG L bonds.