CFP Board Enforcement Process: Resolution of Petitions for Fitness Determination

Posted on August 31st, 2020 at 12:54 PM
CFP Board Enforcement Process: Resolution of Petitions for Fitness Determination

From the Desk of Jim Eccleston at Eccleston Law LLC:

This is the eleventh of several posts detailing the CFP Board enforcement process. This post will focus on the CFP Board’s procedure regarding resolution of a Petitions for Fitness Determination.

A Respondent who is required to demonstrate fitness for CFP Certification may file a Petition for Fitness Determination. The burden of proof is on the Respondent to prove their fitness for CFP certification by a preponderance of the evidence. The CFP Board Rules define “preponderance of the evidence” to mean “more probable than not.”

A Hearing Panel will review the Petition for Fitness Determination and make a recommendation whether to grant or deny the petition. The recommendation must include factual findings, any mitigating or aggravating factors, and any relevant anonymous case histories.

The CFP Board Disciplinary and Ethics Commission (“DEC”) will review the Hearing Panel’s recommendation and either accept, reject, or modify that recommendation. The DEC’s review is de novo, which means that the DEC must “consider the matter anew, as if the Hearing Panel had rendered no recommendation[.]” However, the DEC will give deference to specific aspects of the Hearing Panel’s recommendation, including findings regarding witness credibility and rulings on procedural and evidentiary motions. The DEC will issue a final order which includes factual findings, any mitigating or aggravating factors, and any relevant anonymous case histories. If the DEC denies the Petition for Fitness Determination, the DEC will impose either a temporary or permanent bar.

CFP professionals who receive an inquiry or a complaint from the CFP Board should contact the professionals at Eccleston Law for a free consultation.

The attorneys of Eccleston Law LLC represent investors and advisors nationwide in securities and employment matters. The securities lawyers at Eccleston Law also practice a variety of other areas of practice for financial investors and advisors including Securities FraudCompliance ProtectionBreach of Fiduciary DutyFINRA Matters, and much more. Our attorneys draw on a combined experience of nearly 65 years in delivering the highest quality legal services. If you are in need of legal services, contact us to schedule a one-on-one consultation today.

 

Tags: CFP Board, Resolution of Petitions, Enforcement Process

Return to Archive

TESTIMONIALS

Previous
Next

We just wanted to say thanks for your work in helping us get back some of the money we lost. We are not by any means rich, but we have saved some money and we have done so through a tight-fisted approach to most everything we do. So losing a significant chunk of money hurt…especially at a time when everyone else was growing their accounts. We really appreciate the work you did.

Allan and Adele

LATEST NEWS AND ARTICLES

October 2, 2024
SEC Charges Two South Florida Men for Defrauding Venezuelan-American Investors in $5 Million Scheme

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has filed a complaint against two South Florida men, Francisco Javier Malave Hernandez and Ricardo Javier Guerra Farias, for orchestrating a multi-million dollar investment fraud that targeted members of the Venezuelan-American community.

October 1, 2024
California Advisor Suspended and Fined for Churning Client Accounts

A veteran advisor in Santa Maria, California, Stewart "Paxton" Ginn, has been suspended for 18 months and fined $50,000 by FINRA, according to AdvisorHub

September 30, 2024
Bank of America and Merrill Lynch Settle with FINRA for Supervisory Failures

Bank of America and its subsidiary, Merrill Lynch, have agreed to a $3 million fine and censure as part of a settlement with FINRA over long-term supervisory failures.