CFP Board Enforcement Process: Interim Suspensions

Posted on June 29th, 2020 at 3:48 PM
CFP Board Enforcement Process: Interim Suspensions

From the Desk of Jim Eccleston at Eccleston Law LLC:

This is the second of several posts detailing the CFP Board enforcement process.  The first post detailed the CFP Board’s investigation process.  This post will focus on one potential outcome of a CFP Board investigation: an interim suspension.  

In some instances, the CFP Board will impose an interim suspension of a CFP professional’s Certification and Trademark License while enforcement proceedings are pending.  For most cases, if the CFP Board seeks an interim suspension, it must file a motion with the CFP Board’s Disciplinary and Ethics Commission (the “DEC”).  The respondent will have an opportunity to file an opposition to the motion for an interim suspension.

The DEC will order an interim suspension if it finds by a preponderance of the evidence that respondent’s conduct poses a significant threat to the public or significantly impinges upon the reputation of the profession or the CFP certification marks. An interim suspension order is not subject to appeal. However, a respondent may file a petition to vacate an interim suspension order.

Additionally, the CFP Board Counsel may impose an automatic interim suspension in certain circumstances based on the nature of the alleged violations. For an automatic interim suspension, the CFP Board Counsel is not required to file a motion and DEC participation is not necessary. Alleged violations that could carry an automatic interim suspension include a conviction of a misdemeanor or felony involving fraud, theft, misrepresentation, violence or a crime of moral turpitude.  Additionally, a civil finding that respondent engaged in fraud, theft, misrepresentation, violence or an act of moral turpitude could also lead to an automatic interim suspension.   

CFP professionals who are the subject of a CFP Board investigation should contact the professional at Eccleston Law for a free consultation.

The attorneys of Eccleston Law LLC represent investors and advisors nationwide in securities and employment matters. The securities lawyers at Eccleston Law also practice a variety of other areas of practice for financial investors and advisors including Securities FraudCompliance ProtectionBreach of Fiduciary DutyFINRA Matters, and much more. Our attorneys draw on a combined experience of nearly 65 years in delivering the highest quality legal services. If you are in need of legal services, contact us to schedule a one-on-one consultation today.

Related Attorneys: James J. Eccleston

Tags: eccleston, eccleston law, james eccleston, cfp board, interim suspensions, enforcement process

Return to Archive



If the regulators are after you, and are trying to make a case against you, and you are going to contest their allegations against you, make sure you have the best securities industry defense lawyers, Eccleston Law Firm. My case was spun into a combination of penalties including fines, cash settlements, CE courses and suspension. They were the best I have seen in action. When all was said and done, they had done their magic, my situation was negotiated and settled with a simple "letter of caution" and a case closed without action. It is the most important legal business decision you will ever make, make it Eccleston Law.

Rick R.


March 24, 2023
Heartland Bank & Trust Co. Agrees to $9 Million Settlement For Allegedly Aiding and Abetting a Ponzi Scheme

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has agreed to a $9 million settlement
with Heartland Bank & Trust Co. over the bank’s alleged role in aiding and abetting a $75
million Ponzi scheme.

March 23, 2023
Morgan Stanley Obtains TRO Against Pennsylvania LPL Advisor Over Inherited Accounts and Misrepresentations

A federal judge has awarded Morgan Stanley a temporary restraining order (TRO)
against a Pennsylvania-based advisor who recently departed for LPL Financial.

March 22, 2023
Sanford Bernstein & Co. and Alliance Bernstein Face FINRA Arbitration Claim Over Options Advantage Strategy

Sanford Bernstein & Co. and Alliance Bernstein (Bernstein) are facing what could be the first of several Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) arbitration claims related to its Options Advantage Strategy.