CFP Board Compares its Duty of Care to the SEC’s Reg B-I

Posted on July 30th, 2020 at 3:40 PM

From the Desk of Jim Eccleston at Eccleston Law LLC:

This is the second of several posts discussing the similarities and differences of the SEC’s recently-implemented Regulation Best Interest (“Reg. B-I”) and the CFP Board’s Code of Ethics and Standards of Conduct. Previously, we discussed the difference in the standard of conduct required by the CFP Board code and Reg B-I. In this post, we will look at the duty of care required by the CFP Board and Reg B-I. 

The duty of care required by the CFP Board Code and Standards is a “prudent professional” standard. The CFP Board describes this standard as higher than a “reasonable person” standard. Specifically, the CFP Board Code states that “a CFP professional must act with the care, skill, prudence, and diligence that a prudent professional would exercise[.]”

The duty of care required by the SEC’s Reg. B-I is to “exercise reasonable diligence, care, and skill[.]” Initially, Reg. B-I included “prudence” as part of its duty of care, but it was later removed. However, according to the SEC, “prudence” was removed because it was unnecessary, and its removal “does not lessen or otherwise change the requirements of the SEC’s expectations under the Care Obligation.”

CFP professionals who receive an inquiry or a complaint from the CFP Board should contact the professionals at Eccleston Law for a free consultation.

The attorneys of Eccleston Law LLC represent investors and advisors nationwide in securities and employment matters. The securities lawyers at Eccleston Law also practice a variety of other areas of practice for financial investors and advisors including Securities FraudCompliance ProtectionBreach of Fiduciary DutyFINRA Matters, and much more. Our attorneys draw on a combined experience of nearly 65 years in delivering the highest quality legal services. If you are in need of legal services, contact us to schedule a one-on-one consultation today.

Related Attorneys: James J. Eccleston

Tags: eccleston law, james eccleston, cfp board, sec, reg bi

Return to Archive

TESTIMONIALS

Previous
Next

This was the best of all possible outcomes and I cannot thank you and the team enough.

Michael S.

LATEST NEWS AND ARTICLES

March 21, 2025
SEC Updates Marketing Rule Guidance to Clarify Extracted Performance and Portfolio Metrics

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has issued updated guidance on its marketing rule, addressing industry concerns regarding net performance requirements, extracted performance, and portfolio characteristics.

March 20, 2025
Stifel Loses Raiding Case, Ordered to Pay Over $7 Million in Legal Fees

Stifel Financial has lost its raiding and breach-of-contract claim against a group of advisors who left its Indianapolis office to establish their own firm.

March 19, 2025
FINRA Enforcement Actions in 2024: Fines Drop But Cases Increase

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) imposed $59 million in fines in 2024, reflecting a 35 percent decrease from the previous year, according to an analysis by Eversheds Sutherland.