Arbitration Mandated for Former Morgan Stanley Advisors' Class Claim on Deferred Compensation

Posted on November 28th, 2023 at 1:10 PM
Arbitration Mandated for Former Morgan Stanley Advisors' Class Claim on Deferred Compensation

From the desk of Jim Eccleston at Eccleston Law 

A federal judge in Manhattan has granted Morgan Stanley’s request to transfer a potential class action lawsuit to arbitration.

In a 56-page ruling, Judge Paul G. Gardephe stated that Morgan Stanley successfully demonstrated that advisors had agreed to address such claims through private arbitration as outlined in their employment and bonus contracts. Moreover, the advisors did not opt out of Morgan Stanley’s alternative dispute resolution program, Convenient Access to Resolution for Employees (CARE).

Judge Gardephe concluded that the former advisors had claims under the Employment Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). However, he underscored that the plaintiffs failed to establish that these claims were exempt from arbitration. Despite his ruling preventing the advisors from pursuing class representation, individuals can still independently seek the same damages or relief through arbitration, mirroring what was sought in court.

As reported by AdvisorHub, lead plaintiff Matthew Shafer initiated the case in December 2020, alleging that Morgan Stanley’s compensation plan violated federal laws concerning vesting and anti-forfeiture rules for pension and retirement packages. The plaintiffs, including other former Morgan Stanley advisors who have transitioned to different firms, argue that the company unjustly withholds deferred pay when advisors move to competitors like Raymond James, Ameriprise Financial, and Stiel, Nicolaus & Co.

 

Eccleston Law LLC represents investors and financial advisors nationwide in securities, employment, transition, regulatory, and disciplinary matters.

Tags: eccleston, eccleston law

Return to Archive

TESTIMONIALS

Previous
Next

Jim, Stephany and the whole team were a God send.  We felt like we were put into a situation where we had no advocate. Jim’s team came in with a strong, well laid out strategy on how to get our story heard. Where our outside compliance company had no ability to help, our Broker Dealer was impenitent, and the regulators were aggressive pursuing vague rules, Jim came like a barricade against an assault we did not understand. Though you pay member dues to be affiliated with FINRA and a B/D, you have no voice. The only thing that is truly heard in this un-level playing field is a bulldog’s bark like Jim’s. I would encourage anyone to call Jim and his team to find a real ally in the tough and complicated world of securities regulation. They are truly the best.

Greg P.

LATEST NEWS AND ARTICLES

July 26, 2024
Kentucky Advisor Sues LPL Financial for Alleged Corporate Raid

A Kentucky advisor, Mark Lamkin, has filed a lawsuit against LPL Financial, claiming the independent broker-dealer orchestrated a corporate raid that resulted in the loss of his firm’s entire book of managed assets.

July 25, 2024
FINRA Plans Fee Increases Amid Rising Costs and Losses

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has announced plans to raise fees for its approximately 3,300 broker-dealer member firms. According to AdvisorHub, the self-regulator faces soaring costs, as detailed in its annual report published at the end of June.

July 24, 2024
Raymond James Settles with Oregon Over Excessive Commissions

Raymond James recently settled a case with Oregon's Division of Financial Regulation (“DFR”), agreeing to pay nearly $200,000 over allegations of charging excessive commissions to retail investors.