Accredited Investor Standards Under Review Amid Growing Inflation Numbers

Posted on June 17th, 2024 at 11:26 AM
Accredited Investor Standards Under Review Amid Growing Inflation Numbers

From the desk of Jim Eccleston at Eccleston Law

The criteria defining who qualifies as an "accredited investor" has not seen inflation adjustments for four decades, resulting in a significant increase in households meeting this definition. As reported by FinancialPlanning, the increase could expand further, potentially encompassing nearly half of all U.S. households in the next 20 years unless regulators introduce more stringent criteria.

Accredited investors are considered financially sophisticated enough to invest in high-risk vehicles like hedge funds and private startup investments. Since 1982, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has defined accredited investors as individuals with a net worth of at least $1 million or an annual income exceeding $200,000 for the past two years. The threshold was adjusted in 1988 to include households with a joint annual income of $300,000 and in 2011 to exclude primary residences from net worth calculations. However, inflation has eroded the value of these thresholds over time.

A recent SEC report suggests these standards may need revision. If adjusted for inflation, the net worth limit would be over $3 million, with income limits around $608,000 for individuals and $911,000 for households.

The SEC's report estimates that $3.7 trillion was raised through nonpublic investments in 2022, much of which went to private startup firms. In comparison, registered public market offerings raised $1 trillion. However, the SEC acknowledges that unregistered offerings are challenging to track accurately.

 

Eccleston Law LLC represents investors and financial advisors nationwide in securities, employment, transition, regulatory, and disciplinary matters.

Tags: eccleston, eccleston law, sec

Return to Archive

TESTIMONIALS

Previous
Next

Jim, Stephany and the whole team were a God send.  We felt like we were put into a situation where we had no advocate. Jim’s team came in with a strong, well laid out strategy on how to get our story heard. Where our outside compliance company had no ability to help, our Broker Dealer was impenitent, and the regulators were aggressive pursuing vague rules, Jim came like a barricade against an assault we did not understand. Though you pay member dues to be affiliated with FINRA and a B/D, you have no voice. The only thing that is truly heard in this un-level playing field is a bulldog’s bark like Jim’s. I would encourage anyone to call Jim and his team to find a real ally in the tough and complicated world of securities regulation. They are truly the best.

Greg P.

LATEST NEWS AND ARTICLES

March 4, 2026
Modern Fraud Schemes Escalate in Scale and Sophistication

A recent panel discussion at the Financial Services Institute OneVoice conference in San Diego highlighted how rapidly evolving fraud schemes continue to victimize both retail and wealthy investors.

March 3, 2026
FINRA Suspends Former Stifel Broker Over Costly Account Switching Trades

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) suspended a former Stifel, Nicolaus & Co.

March 2, 2026
FINRA Suspends Cetera Broker for Accepting $50,000 Client Bequest Without Firm Approval

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) imposed a $10,000 fine and a seven-month suspension on an independent broker for accepting a $50,000 bequest from a client without obtaining prior firm approval.